Image of the day

Captured by
Gerald Elkin

House Finch

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

M106 In a 4" Scope

Started by Astroimage2002, 04/19/2008 07:14PM
Posted 04/19/2008 07:14PM Opening Post
Hi Everyone,

It has been a while since I have posted an Image. Here is a shot that I took of M106 with my FSQ. I am looking for critical feedback on it. I am not real happy with it soooo... Please give me ideas on what I can do to pull out more detail!

Shot details
Exposures:140 300 second luminance - Total of 11 hours and 40 minutes taken on four different nights (...Don't hold me to that one smile )
Scope:Takahashi FSQ-106n
Camera:ST-2000 and A'Don filters
Mount:Losmandy G-11 with Gemini

Many Thanks for any and all feedback!

Brian




Attached Image:

Astroimage2002's attachment for post 41732
Posted 04/19/2008 07:38PM #1
Hi Brian,

Here's my feedback,WOW! 8O

I think this looks outstanding and to be honest I can't think of anything to tell you to do different.
You got really deep on this with lots of nice background fuzzies and your processing looks great to me.

I have a few hours of lum on this I now want to throw away and start over wink

Beautiful!

Jason

Posted 04/19/2008 09:51PM #2
This looks really great!
Posted 04/20/2008 12:49AM #3
Brian,
Looks pretty good. I'm not sure what there is to be unhappy about (except maybe you wanted to get color too 8) ).

Seriously though, background looks good, stars look good, Good resolution - Nice image.

Jim Thommes

Mak-Newt 152 mm
C8
Megrez II APO
Zenithstar 66 mm APO
G11/Gemini
ST8300M
Artemis285 Camera
Canon 350D DSLR

http://jthommes.com/Astro/
Posted 04/20/2008 01:25AM #4
Hi Brian,
I think that it is quite good. Focus is nice, well defined and detailed showing lots of good data. Tracking look very good as well. Not much to not like in this shot. grin

[SIZE="Large"][/SIZE][COLOR="Blue"][/COLOR] Floyd Blue grin
Amateur Imager
Posted 04/20/2008 04:07PM #5
That is an excellent image as is, Brian.
I applaud your perseverance in going so deep on just one channel.
Certainly one benefit of having such good signal is that it can take to some sharpening.
I applied some unsharp mask to just your galaxy cores. You, of course, could do better with the original data.
You might want to try some selective deconvolution or other sharpening technique on the galaxies instead of the unsharp mask, then pick the one that looks the best to you.

dan

Attached Image:

dan  kowall's attachment for post 121828