Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck
"Perhaps you should exhibit an ounce of humility here and think about your situation and then reflect on your actions as well."
This is rich coming from you. Pun intended.
It is Herb's website and he's kicked me off twice and in both cases, I never questioned his right to do so, which indicates that I possess the principles to abide by those limitations that Herb places on my membership here.
So then your point is what exactly? Are you suggesting that I'm acting in Hypocritical fashion?
I'll submit that I am not at all. I've accepted in the past Herb's right and his choice to kick me off here. He's done so.
I've never whined about being kicked off. I simply contacted him and asked him why he did so, and also what I needed to do to have my account reinstated. I pondered Herb's requirements and I said to myself "Ok, those are reasonable requirements", and subsequently I decided to submit to Herb's requirements, and he permitted me to get back on here.
Therefore there is neither irony nor hypocrisy in my suggestion to him above to look at his own actions in this situation.
Having said that, permit me to educate you on the point that I'm making above so that you don't continue to be confused Jim.
It is this. A-Mart is Herb's website. He created it and he made the rules. Like all things in life, each of us has choices and we exercise those choices.
The OP has nearly demanded of Herb that he not only refund his money, which incidentally Herb offered flat out. I guess you missed that fact eh?
Now then, not only did the OP'er tell Herb that he should give his money back, but he expects Herb to apologize and reinstate his account.
IMO, those demands are not only Unreasonable, as the OP'er has made them, but they are borderline outrageous.
For him to make those demands of Herb, strikes me as entitled.
He is free to make those demands and see what happens, but this is Herb's website, he owns it, he created it, and it is his property.
Therefore Herb's words are always going to be the last words, and that is how it should be. If the OP'er doesn't like the rules he is free to leave and go somewhere else and sell his goods.
I'm guessing that he has profited off of being able to sell things here or he wouldn't be here still.
Now then, not only did he place his demands on Herb, but the OP also started an angry public,
calling out of Herb for a public war of words, and at that point, he is inviting other opinions. I provided my opinion of my perception of the wants and demands of the OP'er.
It was apparent to me that he was inviting counter opinions.
Now then Jim, you've in essence
called me out for my sentence above: "
Perhaps you should exhibit an ounce of humility here and think about your situation and then reflect on your actions as well."
Ok, let's delve into that. When I express my remarks to you and others in the political forum, I base those remarks on
our banter back and forth. The majority of the time when I make snide remarks or namecalling, it is in direct response to one of your previous snide comments to me or your flat out namecalling of me.
However there are some instances where I initiate said namecalling or attacks on you.
If and when I decide that I was or am out of line, I will respond the way I see fit.
This portion of course has nothing to do with the Original posting of the person who started this thread, so if you want to take it somewhere else into another forum I suggest you do so.
Happy Independence Day.