Image of the day

Captured by
Gary Taylor

M27 - Dumbell Nebula

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Nagler 7 or Nagler %?

Started by auriga, 04/23/2005 01:11AM
Posted 04/23/2005 01:11AM Opening Post

In my scope my Nagler 9 gives 161x. (The scope is an 11 f4.55 SM Dob with Paracorr yeilding an effective focal e length of 62.5 inches). I need something higher for the moon and planets. Seeing is not so good here in Ohio. A Nagler 7 would give 208x, which sounds a bit low -- 250 would be perfect I think -- and a 5 Nagler would give 280. Which should I choose?
Thanks for any advice.
Bill Meyers
Posted 04/23/2005 06:45PM #1
Hi Bill,
Seeing conditions here in Colorado are, most of the time, pretty so-so. But on occasion we do get some decent atmospheric stability that, when combined with our dark and usually transparent skies, allows higher magnifications. Even so, seeing can vary quite a bit from one night to the next.

I found that having a variety of eyepiece focal lengths allows picking one that yields the maximum magnification seeing conditions will support. That meant biting the bullet and getting several eyepieces in short focal lengths. My short FL collection includes 3.5mm, 7mm, 9mm and 11mm Nagler T6 eyepieces, a Takahashi 5mm LE, and 14mm Radian (OK, this last one isn't really short...). No, I don't own stock in Tele Vue wink

Seriously, this eyepiece selection allows choosing the optimum FL for given seeing conditions (my main scope is a Tak TOA-130). Sometimes the 11mm is the shortest FL that can be used, sometimes a 9mm works fine but 7mm is too much, and other times the 5mm is best. On those rare occasions of really good seeing, the 3.5mm eyepiece can be used. The latter works out to about 286x, or about 57x per inch of aperture in the Tak.

If you get a chance, go to a star party and try some of the shorter FL eyepieces in your scope. You may find that you want both a 7mm and 5mm eyepiece. Alternatively, you could try a Nagler zoom (I think they're available in 2-4mm and 3-6mm versions), which would let you adjust FL and magnification to suit conditions.

Ron
Posted 04/25/2005 07:18PM #2
Bill,

The seeing not good here in Ohio? Never! wink I'm about 80 miles north of you, and I know what you mean. Today, beautiful blue clear sky. Forecast for tonight, becoming overcast with showers late. Aughhhhh!

I am looking at getting a higher power EP - currently I have a 7.5 mm Plossl. Several times I knew the seeing would support higher power. I think I want to find a UO 5mm Ortho, which would give a magnification of about 57 times the diameter of my objective in inches.

Question, do you remove the Paracor when you use shorter focal length eyepieces?

Rick W also in Ohio

8" Zhumell Dob
90mm f11 achro refractor
4-1/2 f4 rich field newt reflector