I've seen this in several manufacturer "ads" now as something special. I understand it pertains to the lack of particular optical aberrations i.e. perfect lens. Without digging into "Telescope Optics..." I'm curious if the highest quality apos like AP/TEC etc as well as maybe the D&G achromats...all of which are painstakingly figured and corrected to eliminate secondary aberrations ('cept for focal length related CA in the latter) can also be considered "anastigmatic"? My gut tells me this may be just marketing mumbo-jumbo to separate themselves from the pack and impress the impressible, or is this actually a valid optical attribute only the luckiest and most fortunate telescope users should pursue?
Thanks, Pat
Thanks, Pat
Pat Kelly in Centreville (Delmarva), Maryland. Retired but working second career.
Telescope - 8" f/12 classic achromat refractor by D&G Optical; Manheim, Pennsylvania;
Mount - 1200DA metric black classic equatorial mount circa 1992 by Astro-Physics; Machesney Park, IL;
BlueStar Observatory 13 x 13 roll off by Backyard Observatories; Lodi, Ohio;
Previous telescopes A-Z: Astro-Physics to Zeiss...D&G Optical Aficionado; The Classic Refractor - The telescope everyone wants to have used but no one wants to own.