Posts Made By: Brian McFarland

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

Oh F off. You imply this all the time in your thread titles, your posts, and your off topic posts in threads you didn't start. Need I go one? Well, yeah, you keep bringing up, out of context, that I supposedly believe the constitution states that larger states have more senators. That's usually followed by a few lines of insults implying my intellect is deficient. When you do bring this up, which is constantly, it's usually when you have nothing else to add to the topic of a thread. Typical Dodgeball Davis mode of operations. 

Maybe I should bring up how you threatened me with physical harm and throw that into your face more often?

Or how you've harassed me with private messages this past last week after I repeatedly asked you to stop? Maybe I should mention that? 

Sorry everyone, I just don't give a flying F anymore. I've had it with this POS and again starting to feel I don't need to be posting here. How many folks have have left in the past five years? Ten years? I know some pass on, but  I go back and look in the archives and miss those folks. There used to be more conservatives, too, but even they were chased off or chose to quit posting. What I don't see are any posts made by Davis as they were all expunged. Why was that? I do enjoy this place or I wouldn't have hung out for so long along with liking every one of you guys minus Davis. I've had this feeling before yet always come back.   

His behavior here is no better than that of his orange idol when he stormed out of court today, although he'll probably appreciate being compared to him.

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

To the forum: Sorry for the argument I had with Davis yesterday. The man has no shame with his douch bag for a mouth and his dishonest style of conversation/debate. 

Here is the complete PM exchange initiated by Davis with my replies. Obviously, he spun it in his own special way. I think I'm pretty clear in my responses and in no way was I calling him names in the PMs. Obviously, he is nothing but a school bully and agitator pretending to be man. Talk about trying to goad someone into an altercation, wether here on the internet, or in person since he once threatened me with physical harm.

SUBJECT: Hi Buddy!

Davis: I almost forgot something, then I thought about your Wayne LaPierre story today

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uSTOHa4Im4

Me: Stop sending me private messages. I'm not your buddy.


SUBJECT: Re: Hi Buddy!

Davis: So then Bowling is out of the question for our Weekend get together??    :'(

Me: Please stop private messaging me. If you have something to say say it in the forum. 


SUBJECT: I just need to get some clarity..

Davis: So then we aren't friends anymore, and I shouldn't send you any more private messages???
Just wanting to understand  smile

Me: I asked you to stop sending me private messages twice now. If you have anything to say to me regarding the politics forum please do it there.


SUBJECT: Since you've decided you'll be calling me out by name in each and every response you write on the forum. I thought it would be appropriate to send you a PM when you do it.

Davis: As for that LaPierre story of yours..... 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uSTOHa4Im4

Keep them coming! smile

Me: For the last time, please stop private messaging me. If you have anything to say to me concerning a post I make please do it there.

End of messages.

He finally got the hint after four attempts.

Is this the way a normal person acts? Am I just so sheltered that I've never really personally met or experienced anyone on the internet quite like Davis? I'm on FB but really don't care for it and other than occasionally on this forum I'm mostly over on CN. It is very Pollyanna-ish, but in a good way, where folks are more or less decent to each other. I have lots of friends there and sometimes hope they don't read my posts here.

I try to keep my cool here, but Davis just knows how to push those buttons.  

<snark>. Concerning the number of attempts with the PMs and with all of Davis' previous innuendo and homophobia, which happens quite often, maybe he in fact he really does like me. You know, wink wink, nudge, nudge, know what I mean? Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Sorry Rich, I'm taken, my wife and partner in life for 41 years and I are very happy. 

Too bad you'll never experience something as great as that.

Originally Posted by James Lacey

So, let me get this straight. The Republicans can't pass or support a border bill or a foreign aid bill, but they have plenty of time for a bogus impeachment. Great job!

The fact that you are crowing about the GOP wasting the people's time and money on a pointless and baseless impeachment that has zero chance of conviction in the Senate tells us all we need to know about today's GOP. The Senate may not even have a trial and probably will shelve the impeachment to a committee to die. So, bravo! What a colossal waste of time and money.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Since you epitomize the average uninformed and ignorant Marxist Democrat voter, who hasn't the vaguest idea of what is going on at the border, it is no wonder that you're so in the dark regarding the facts of the situation.   

Originally Posted by James Brown

Unfortunately Brian, the voters may be paying attention, to the BS and idiocy on both sides.   Two interesting articles about the developing Fanni Willis debacle on Real Clear Politics.   The right slant view and the left slant view pretty much agree that there is a good chance Willis's office will be tossed from the prosecution because of Willis and her special prosecutor/lover's hijinks.   As the Georgia prosecution (or any of the others) blows up in the Democrat's faces, Trump's election becomes more and more likely. 

https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-the-south/the-tangled-fates-of-fani-willis-and-her-biggest-case

https://1ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bostonherald.com%2F2024%2F02%2F14%2Fhowie-carr-fani-willis-drama-must-see-moment%2F

A Georgia face-plant is going to be especially dangerous since Biden refuses to step down after each embarrassment.  

On another matter, I for one do not think most persuadable voters understand why nice but forgetful old-man Joe Biden gets a pass on his classified document crimes, while Trump faces trial and incarceration.  Sure there are nuanced differences, but in the mind of anyone who would consider voting for Trump, the nuances are overwhelmed by the appearance of political prosecution going hand in glove with political favoritism.   

On another matter the Supreme Court's likely unanimous decision calling bull on the attempt to use the 14th Amendment to keep Trump off the ballot in Colorado and other states is blowing up in the D's faces, as predicted. 

Nice job Ds.  Every day I become more convinced that Trump gets 4 more years.  Really nice job.

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi James:  The difference is huge because you are not the typical voter.  You are highly educated, very thoughtful, and appreciate nuance.   Ask Richard if the difference is huge and justifies prosecution in one case, but not the other.   So I agree with your assessment, but I am predicting a different assessment by some number of the rare persuadable voter bloc.

I also appreciate your broad stroke electoral college analysis. It makes a lot of sense to me.   Still, there are possibly swing voters in swing states who are feeling pain in the grocery stores, at the pump, or in a new mortgage who are willing to vote for Trump because their own blue-collar financial picture has deteriorated.   

Also, the polls are not as optimistic as you, and I fear that Biden is the one candidate who could possibly lose in 2024.  Thanks for the encouragement though!   Jim

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi Brian,

Oops!   Indeed, mistaking your analysis for James L's analysis is a compliment!   That said, my reply to James is 100% applicable to you too!  Every word of it!  

p.s.  I am old!  Retired as of 2/1/24.  Digging it immensely!  I followed my wife on her business trip to Spain a week or so ago, which was fabulous.   Been messing around on some projects - can't wait for March/April, when the fly fishing season starts!   (And cycling and hiking in earnest!)   This January/February has been kind of cold and dreary.

Originally Posted by James Lacey

So, a question for the forum. Is Rich's excessive posting with thread titles long enough to be novels and full of misinformation an A) desperate cry for help, B) a distraction from one of his famous embarrassing moments, or C) an attention-seeking theatrical level of emotional outburst related to some mental disorder?

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi James, or Brian!  I hope you are right.  And, I should trust the voters more.  My main political worry right now is the prosecutions will backfire and get Trump elected.  This is the prism through which I am viewing things like the Hur report or the Fanni Willis hearing.  The prosecutions have pretty much undeniably rallied Trump's base.

Originally Posted by James Lacey

So, here is the funny thing. This is enough "facts" and "evidence," according to the Richard Davis burden of proof, to show that the Hunter Biden investigation was entirely a political hit-job and a witch hunt. However, there are several things you will not see. First, Rich will not apply the same standards to this event that he applies to Trump's legal troubles. Second, you will not see Joe Biden use this revelation as an avenue to promote grievance and resentment. Third, Democrats, in general, will not be crying and whining about weaponized government. Lastly, you will not see Republicans apologizing for any of this.