Marriage v. Civil UnionPosted By John Whitby |
Marriage is a convention of religion.
Civil unions are a convention of politics and society - creating a legal, contractual arrangement between two people (at least for today).
The two should be separate. Let governments require civil union contracts in order for couples to benefit socially from that union.
Let churches administer marriages, which should be moral contracts, as they wish. Marriages would be contractual only as far as churches would allow amongst themselves(like baptisms).
If one church wants to 'marry' homosexuals - that is the church's choice. If another wants to marry for all eternity, so be it.
Get the government and politics OUT of marriage - it is a religious and moral institution which should offer no civil protection.
If your daughter wants a "church wedding" she and her husband could execute a civil contract on the side.
Civil unions are a convention of politics and society - creating a legal, contractual arrangement between two people (at least for today).
The two should be separate. Let governments require civil union contracts in order for couples to benefit socially from that union.
Let churches administer marriages, which should be moral contracts, as they wish. Marriages would be contractual only as far as churches would allow amongst themselves(like baptisms).
If one church wants to 'marry' homosexuals - that is the church's choice. If another wants to marry for all eternity, so be it.
Get the government and politics OUT of marriage - it is a religious and moral institution which should offer no civil protection.
If your daughter wants a "church wedding" she and her husband could execute a civil contract on the side.