Posts Made By: Richard Davis

I urge everyone to get this book, as it is selling out like hotcakes.

First Week out it sold 400,000 copies.

2nd Week it sold 150,000 copies. 

We need to take back this nation from the crazy insane Leftist Marxist Democrat Party who seek to destroy it from within.

The Marxist Democrat Party doesn't care any longer if they bankrupt this nation.

They don't care if they are exposed for their hate of the United States, since they've been hiding their radical agenda for Decades now.

But in the last 5 or 6 years, we have come to see what they are all about.

Get the book.  Learn about what is in store for this nation, if we don't stop the radical left from destroying this country.

Joe Biden is completely gone upstairs.

The man can barely speak, let alone think. 

And he's just the puppet of the Marxist left. 

Remember that Joe Biden isn't running anything.  He doesn't even know who he is half the time. 

And congrats to the RINOs who voted for him.

Are you proud to have been so ignorant, so uninformed, and so unaware of what he and his party of leftists would do?  

He is a smart cookie, he's a libertarian running on the Republican ticket, and although it might be impossible for him to reverse all the damage California Leftist morons have done to that state, he at least has a brain and is a thinking individual.

I don't know why he wants the job, but he's leading the Republican ticket and will give Gavin Newsom a run for his money.

Newsom doesn't want to debate Elder as Larry Elder will crush him in a war of wits.  

Newsome's henchmen tried to keep him off the ticket in California, through their SLEAZE tactics, but he sued and won a unanimous verdict against the Corrupt Newsome administration, so go and vote for an intellectual and an honest guy, rather than a scumbag like Gavin Newsom.  

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

"Flynn makes bizarre remark about AR-15: 'Maybe I'll find somebody in Washington, D.C.'"
Even if he didn't mean, some unbalanced Trumptoid might...
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/564930-michael-flynn-with-new-ar-15-maybe-ill-find-somebody-in

He didn't say what "The Hill" claimed he said. I heard that the audio was doctored and he didn't say "find somebody", and that those words were substituted in the video at that point.

That is why the response from the guy with the Microphone says after the statement "This one is compliant in Florida", which doesn't comport with Gen. Flynn's statement.  It doesn't even make sense to say "This one is compliant in Florida" if he had said "Maybe I'll find somebody in Wash. D.C."

It is just more doctored crap from the left, similar to the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman 911 call whereby NBC doctored his 911 call, and truncated a lot of the language to make Zimmerman appear to be a racist.  NBC put out an audio where they removed a bunch of his words, and they then claimed that Zimmerman said: "The guy is up to no good, he is black".

The actual audio of that call went like this:   

Zimmerman: " This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about".

Dispatcher:  "  OK, and this guy — is he black, white or Hispanic?"

Zimmerman: "  He looks black."

Because of the lies by NBC, they fired 3 of the people working for them who doctored the video to smear Zimmerman.

These "News" outlets are a joke anymore. 

Of course we wouldn't expect you not to blindly regurgitate anything that the lying left tells you to say.

It takes a brain to discern the truth. 

As I've said before, you simply regurgitate whatever the left tells you to think.

 

Originally Posted by James Lacey

These complaints are pretty funny coming from the guy who routinely posts outrage media full of false narratives and out-of-context quotes as if it's some gospel truth. You know from the likes of TheBlaze or TheDailyWire or other high-quality news outlets. Didn't you even recently post a Twitter clip that made a completely unfounded claim about Biden's mental soundness? Didn't that video clip show only a tiny portion of the exchange he had with reporters? Maybe you should take some of your advice and stop blindly regurgitating what the right feeds you and get a brain so you can discern the truth?

Really?  I put up false narratives?  No, I simply call out the left for all of their despicable actions and acts.

And so yes, I put up that clip of Biden saying something that sounded like "my butts been wet".

What did the babbling Biden say?  Nobody knows what he said including you.  

You tried to defend his babbling, as if what you claimed he said, made any coherent sense at all.  

It didn't.

You claimed he said "Must what be what?"

If one listens to the video/audio more than once, his first word sounds like "My".  His last word sounds like "wet"

His utterance sure doesn't sound like what you claimed "Must what be what".

Even if it was what you claimed he said, what the Hell does "Must what be what" even mean???  

Can you give an English translation?

Of course you can't.

And furthermore, trying to decipher what a senile Joe Biden is saying is difficult enough on its own.

I simply tried to figure out the utterance.

I didn't doctor the audio, as the left does continuously.

The George Zimmerman example wasn't the first or last time the leftist news outlets have doctored audio.

The NY Times has been caught lying literally 100s of times over the decades and have had to post "retractions" to their stories, which they conveniently do on page 38 or 40 of their rag.

This is after they put up the lies about people they don't like and post them above the fold on the front page.

There is no comparison in simply putting up Biden's utterances when he makes them.

We don't change audio to try to influence the thinking of the reader.  

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

The fact remains that what Rich said is fact.....seems you want to ignore that and instead attack the messenger ie the usual fare here

It is his usual fare.

That is how they operate on the far left like Lacey.

They just hurl lies and repeat falsehoods.

They still are repeating falsehoods about Trump.

Lacey repeats them all the time.

Consider the lie that Donald Trump used the DOJ and Federal Agents to clear the park in DC so that he could hold up a Bible and have a photo shoot.

That was an utter lie fabricated by the left.  

Lacey probably still believes it, even though the DOJ came out and flatly denied that Trump had given any order to them.

They lied about the border situation, showing cages with kids in them, attributed the views to the Trump administration holding said kids, and ran with their lying narrative that Trump was treating kids like prisoners in cages.

When it was pointed out that all the photos were from 2014 and the cages were built by Barack Obama, they never even apologized and moved on and they STILL say that those cages were made by Trump and his administration.

Think Lacey cares about the truth?

Of course he doesn't, he just continues the lies. 

Originally Posted by James Lacey

I have no support for Rod's original post. Whether or not Rich's complaints are valid is immaterial regarding his ad-hominem attack, which is entirely devoid of any actual self-awareness.

That's a lie right there.

Where is my ad-hominem attack above? Be specific.

You'll be impotent to show any "ad-hominem" attack because I didn't make any attack. 

I made a reasoned decision about Rod, being a person who simply regurgitates everything the left tells him.

That's not "ad-hominem", it is an observation of what Rod does, and I can back it up with evidence.

You might want to go get a dictionary and learn what "ad-hominem" means.  

And if you claim that I'm making ad-hominem attacks, look in the mirror pal.  You're as guilty as anyone in doing it.  

I simply stated that they doctored the audio of Flynn's words, and I called out the left as doing that type of thing all the time.  

Originally Posted by James Lacey

Of course, you do. All the time. The fact that you don't recognize it only underscores your lack of self-awareness. The biggest problem is your fight with some imaginary version of the left that does not exist.

You just did an ad-hominem attack on me above.  

So you're as guilty as the rest.  

Ad-hominem means attacking the person rather than the argument.  

You just accused me for at least the 900th time, of lacking self-awareness.

Would you like me to scroll back through your responses to show all of your attacks on me?
 
It is pretty easy.  

Which makes you a raging hypocrite.  

Originally Posted by James Lacey

Of course, you do. All the time. The fact that you don't recognize it only underscores your lack of self-awareness. The biggest problem is your fight with some imaginary version of the left that does not exist.

Just a couple of your "ad-hominem" attacks on me:

1.  J Lacey:  "However, feel free to froth at mouth"   -  Hmm.. attacking me personally, not my argument - Ad Hominem.  

2.  J L:  " it would take considerable time to debunk them all, with no effect on your ignorance"  Hmm... attacking me personally, not my argument - Ad hominem.

3.  J L:  " stop blindly regurgitating what the right feeds you and get a brain so you can discern the truth? Hmm... attacking me personally, not my argument - Ad hominem.  

4.  J L:  "Your inability to learn from your obvious partisan and childish mistakes will forever doom you to little more than an annoying barking dog that doesn't know when to shut up"  -  Hmm...  attacking me personally, not my argument - Ad Hominem

Hypocrite much James??   

Originally Posted by James Lacey

I have no support for Rod's original post. Whether or not Rich's complaints are valid is immaterial regarding his ad-hominem attack, which is entirely devoid of any actual self-awareness.

And so now that I've crushed your hypocritical assertion, implying that only I engage in Ad-hominem attacks, when it is your staple of debate tactics, I'd just like to point out the complete lack of self-awareness on your part.  

Funny how you exist here on this forum as the pot calling the kettle black.  

I just gave 4 instances of your regular ad-hominem attacks.  You do it to everyone.

It took me all of about 3 minutes.

Talk about a lack of self-awareness.  

Your photo is in the dictionary in place of the definition of it!  

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

No it is not a fact and nothing was "doctored" in the Hill report. And the statement from Rich stating he "heard" it was doctored is merely here-say which YOU accept as factual. Lol!
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/07/26/michael-flynn-rifle-comments-vpx.cnn

Greg didn't say that what I heard was factual.  

He said that what I called out the leftist media for doing was factual.  

I had "heard" that they doctored his comments.  That is a fact that I heard that they doctored his comments.

Now, NBC DID Doctor the audio of Trayvon Martin.

As for the comments of FLYNN?  I would like to know how the conversation went.  

What was SAID BEFORE Flynn's comment there?  Please inform me?

Perhaps they were talking about the ability to get a PERMIT IN WASHINGTON?

Is that possible?  Do you know what they were talking about?  If you do, then inform us about it Jack.

And I stated that I heard they doctored his comments. 

Here is a possible scenario of the entire conversation.  

They introduce some guns at the event and talk about them.

They tell Flynn, "you'll have to get a permit in Washington D.C".  

Then Flynn says "Maybe I'll find someone in Washington D.C."

Then the other says "well this is Florida compliant".  

So is that discussion possible to have transpired between them all?  Is it?

YOU have ZERO idea what the conversation was about, preceeding General Flynn's comments.

And why is that?  Because CNN conveniently Truncated the conversation.  

Yet that is this is the type of thing CNN engages in all the time, to purposely misrepresent what a person said.

Then they IMPLY a sinister meaning to someone's commentary.

And you do the same exact thing as CNN does, and you do it All the time. 

I could give you a THOUSAND examples of the stuff YOU regurgitate here ALL the time.

One is the Donald Trump SUPPOSED supporting of White Nationalists and the KKK in Charlottesville years back.

CNN truncated what he said and RAN with it.  They claimed he praised Nazis and the White Nationalists, by taking a SINGLE sentence of his commentary that day where he said "there are fine people on Both sides".

Then CNN and YOU, and I believe Lacey came on her and LIED about it.  You said he praised White Nationalists.

It took Steve Cortes OF CNN to write an Article Debunking that LIE by CNN and YOU.

They CONVENIENTLY LEFT OUT Donald Trump's statement that he gave immediately AFTER the first statement.

In his follow up statement Trump said "And I'm not talking about the KKK or the White Nationalists, they are to be CONDEMNED TOTALLY".

Why did CNN LIE about that?

They had the ENTIRE transcript and Audio, yet they LIED and made FALSE implications. 

Explain that.  

You don't know, and I don't know how the conversation went BEFORE the 3 SECOND snippet that CNN used to imply something about Flynn.  

So Genius, tell us all exactly what Flynn meant when he said "Maybe I'll find somebody in Washington D.C."

Inform us Genius.