Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck
General Mattis isn't OK with it either.
"Donald Trump is the first president in my lifetime who does not try to unite the American people—does not even pretend to try. Instead he tries to divide us. We are witnessing the consequences of three years of this deliberate effort. We are witnessing the consequences of three years without mature leadership. We can unite without him, drawing on the strengths inherent in our civil society. This will not be easy, as the past few days have shown, but we owe it to our fellow citizens; to past generations that bled to defend our promise; and to our children."
https://www.axios.com/james-mattis-trump-protests-f325f239-17f1-4795-b6a4-0ab1587ad210.html
"...past generations that bled to defend our promise..." This is language from a general that the Dems do not like, usually.
Trump wanted a smaller footprint in the ME, Mattis wanted to stay in Syria. We left. Mattis said he would not be the general that lost to ISSIS.
So years later, have we lost to ISSIS?
The Dem support for Mad Dog seems to be that Trump and him disagreed. Is this wrong? There has been a lot from the liberal side complaining about Mattis, until now.