Posts Made By: Jim Babcock

You know how libs like to think that they are logical, use science as the basis for what they say, and how only their methods for calculating should be trusted? Well most of us know what a bunch of liberal BS that really is. Here is an article about how the WH calls anyone who checks their lies calculator abuse:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/10/160000-per-stimulus-job-white-house-calls-that-calculator-abuse.html

Only a lib could come up with a term like that. Look at how the Administration continues to refuse to take responsibility for what they say. Since only stupid libs (as opposed to regular libs) believe Obama and what his Administration at this point. So everyone, even some in the media, are starting to double check what they say. The more their lies are checked the more stupid this community organizer is demonstrated to be. A great example from the article is how they were proud to take credit for 250 specific jobs, when eventually it turned out to be 74 jobs. I do not know why anyone would believe that they even created that many. They have lost what little credibility they had.

Don't even think about using basic math to figure out how the libs wasted the money they are stilling from you and all of your future generations, this typical liberalism will make you sick.

BTW Barry, 2 + 2 = 4. Community organizers do not have to be very bright, and obviously neither do leaders of the Dem party.

There is an old saying when it comes to trying to determine the true reasons for decision making (especially in politics) "follow the money". Well it has been quite clear for some time to everyone except libs that Obama's policies have been designed to benefit lib causes. In fact his Administration has a motto on the topic, but I digress. Here is an explanation of a small part of the payback that the libs have planned for their destruction of the health care system:

http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/30/pelosi-health-care-bill-blows-a-kiss-to-trial-lawyers/#more-23042

For those trying to understand what the definition of lib is, here is another lesson for you.

The failed Obama presidency continues to do as it has from the start - well - FAIL. It was quite predictable except to those who thought that one of the most important criteria for hiring a president was the candidate's race. In the latest chapter on the trail to destruction of the country, this evil administration demonstrates another liberal failure.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/01/world/middleeast/01clinton.html

In typical liberal style Obama has once again attempted to inflict maximum damage to long held relationships while coddling dictators and terrorists. This latest appeasement once again demonstrates for all that liberal politics are unproductive at best.

As touchy libs love to use race as a weapon here and some of the lefts using the color of a candidates skin as a primary criteria for voting for thecurrent president, I found this article very interesting.

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/01/white-candidate-scrambles-vote-attitudes-in-atlant/

I have visited Atlanta, but never understood the intricacy of the racial aspect of politics there.

Some interesting quotes from the article:

"We haven't always gotten the credit for that, no," said former Atlanta Mayor Andrew Young, who oversaw the early days of the city's rebirth during the 1980s. "I brought in 1,100 companies from around the world - $70 billion in private investment - and generated more than a million new jobs.

"But most people think that's automatic, that that would have happened anyway," he said with a laugh.

So in typical lib thinking the color of the skin of the politician was the reason that the mayors were successful.

The contest is posing some delicate questions for a city that has long prided itself on its progressive racial attitudes - the "city too busy to hate."

The only reason that they are delicate is because it would now be hypocritical for these libs to now say that they are only too busy to hate as long as the result ends up with the right racial result.

While some in the majority-black city insist race is playing no role in the election, others say the issue is just under the surface.

"I suspect for many voters, maybe all voters, race would be something they would think about, and although it's not the only factor, for some voters it is the determining factor," said University of Georgia political science professor Charles Bullock.

What do they mean just under the surface? It is for many libs the determining factor.

The Survey USA poll found Mrs. Norwood leading by a 6-to-1 margin among whites, Republicans and independents. Mr. Reed, who has been endorsed by Mr. Young, leads among blacks, who made up 59 percent of the electorate in Survey USA's turnout model.

And in a major break with past elections, a separate Insider Advantage poll on Oct. 16 reported that Mrs. Norwood was even leading among the city's black voters, with nearly one-third supporting her.

In this country blacks normally vote the way that their masters tell them to. It is interesting that in that city there are actually some blacks who are willing to think for themselves. I find it interesting how this paragraph is a demonstration that the thesis of this article is wrong. Why does not the writer anywhere in the article explain the candidates political positions?

But this year's race has not split neatly along racial lines, as some prominent black politicians have stepped out to support Mrs. Norwood.

Even some black masters are breaking ranks with the typical way racists have voted historically. So maybe the rank and file blacks are still just doing as their masters order them to.

"With the 'Black Mayor First' approach, there is an unstated assumption that having a black mayor in Atlanta is equal to having a black social, economic and political agenda, or at least someone in office who would be sensitive to that agenda if not a full promoter of that agenda," the memo said.

ABSOLUTELY!!! Libs always act this way. The color of skin is a primary factor that libs use for making many decisions. How liberal of them.

"You speak for no one," Mr. Long said in a letter to the group. "There are no masses of black voters waiting with bated breath to hear from you who the anointed candidate will be."

This is so obvious.


A very interesting article indeed.

It has been a year this week since the first black president was elected to office. What a difference the world is. 8O

The guy said a year ago that they would be humble and non-partisan. Is he a joke or just a liar?

We all now know exactly what libs mean when they say change. This term by libs means that they simply want to convert the country into a socialist country. They admitted early on that they intended to take full political advantage of every disaster, and they have over the year done just that. Obama has left a wake of destruction in his path.

This has been change only libs can be believe in.

On this glorious anniversary of the idiot being annoyed to the White House by his racist comrades, we are seeing that the people have apparently learned their lesson. Conservatives and Republicans are rolling over the lib machine powered by the Obama ... cough cough ... campaign. While libs thought that their extremist socialist leader and his insane policies would bring nirvana to this country, we have seen that the community organizer from the hood knows little more than the lessons he learned from his mentors and buddies, Wright and Aires. We have seen their devastation, and this opening folly for the mid term election looks to be a positive change for the country.

Just to let you know I just got off of a call with my managers and tomorrow I will be purchasing 9 new cars for a company that I have a financial interest in. I will only be considering cars manufactured by companies that Obama has not screwed up when he forced the government to purchase them. I have been speaking to other business owners as well. We are speaking with our money. Obama sucks and so does his policies. Obama and his insane policies have failed and will fail. As I have said I will do ANYTHING legal to ensure that Obama insanity is a failure. Commies like Obama and their lib policies must fail for the sake of the country.

BTW I expect to only purchase Ford, but I would buy a foreign car before I would empower idiots like OWright.

We are never surprised when a liberal politician breaks a promise. Actually it is more news worthy when they do not break their promise and the result actually increases personal liberty. But that does not mean that we should not call these slime balls on it when break yet another promise.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/11/pelosi_breaks_pledge_to_put_he.asp

Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office tells THE WEEKLY STANDARD that the speaker will not allow the final language of the health care to be posted online for 72 hours before bringing the bill to a vote on the House floor, despite her September 24 statement that she was "absolutely" committed to doing so.

In the world of liberalism if you do not comply with their latest scheme you will go to jail. Now libs will attack and say that I am exaggerating. But as usual they will be wrong. Here is the proof:

http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/06/committee-confirms-comply-with-pelosi-care-or-go-to-jail/

...a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail.

So we continue to see what happens when you move someone who cut their political teeth on corrupt Chicago thug politics. Essentially the libs health care scheme is just another lib shake down scheme. With libs in complete control, there are no limits to what these extremists will do to maximize their destruction of this country. Anyone who dares stand in their way will be headed to jail. Now that is change only a lib can believe in.

The mid term elections cannot come too soon.

CNN and libs like to pretend that CNN and other main stream media outlets are fair and balanced. In fact, some of the lefties believe that ALL media is right leaning. I guess that does more to explain just how extreme some of the lefties really are than anything else.

With that in mind, do you know of an example where any of the political commentators on the leftists most hated network Fox was essentially sent packing because they did not tow the conservative line? I can not. Aren't libs the ones who pretend to be open minded and who like to pretend that they believe in diversity? As any thinking person who pays attention knows, libs are some of the most closed minded arrogant people around. They believe in diversity as long as it matches the lib play book. A recent example that demonstrated libs, their closed mindedness and how their propaganda machines silence discent is the Dobbs removal from CNN.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/dobbs_gave_up_on_3EsCWZGeRuYrPsFuzm8YoJ

He will be giving up millions because he will not carry the lib's water. How dare him question the legitamacy of the idiot in the White House?

Obama and his jack boots have a demonstrated history in office of doing whatever they desire that advances their destructive and extremist policies. 2 years ago if someone would have said that the US federal government would mismanage and throw away the trillions the Dems have, or would have said that the federal government would take over complete industries the way these socialist have, you would have been called an extremist and margianalized. There are no limits to what these insane leftists will do to destroy this country. They have moved the bar so left that we cannot have elections soon enough.