It's That Bad...Posted By Richard Davis |
Excuse me. Let me repeat the question to you and maybe you can answer it instead of dodging it.Originally Posted by James Brown
OK, some whack-a-do on talk radio makes up a baseless, fact-free defense: "they doctored the audio." You repeat it without specific endorsement, but without any denial either. You are just "throwing it out there." You don't seem to care whether the assertion is true, because it comports with one of your cherished beliefs. This is by definition a conspiracy theory. Rubes like you are why conspiracy theories (on the right or left) have such legs.
Also, I posted several times on Russiagate being the "big lie" of our times. Rod always replied. We disagreed reasonably. You must have missed it, or perhaps you are once again just making crap up.
Jim
Does my 1 time statement that I had heard stating a fact that I had heard that assertion on a local radio show and it seemed plausible to me, amount to a "conspiracy theory"??
There was a statement on the local radio where a caller posited the idea that Flynn's words were doctored.
Umm... that's a fact. I was listening at the time. I don't deny that.
So then, I'll ask again where does the conspiracy theory play out?? Is repeating a statement of a situation I thought to seem plausible now amount to a conspiracy?
Yes or no please.
Doesn't a "conspiracy" amount to many people, numerous people or is it now one person?
I answered a posting by Rod. That was my assertion. I don't deny that assertion. Yes, I said that.
I also said almost immediately after I made that statement, that I needed the context of Flynn's statement to evaluate what he meant by that.
And so then you make the LEAP that I'm promoting a conspiracy theory. Really?" Approximately 2 statements later, I made the statement that it appeared that Flynn DID say that.
So then, where is the "conspiracy theory"?
Can you identify it? LOL
I was offered a better view of the video and I conceded then, as I concede now that it appears that Flynn did say those words.
So then, I'll ask again, where is the conspiracy theory, the one you are claiming I'm promoting??
I do think that the implication that Flynn was making a threat to someone needs context to understand what he was responding to.
Would you like to answer the question of the context of Flynn's statement?