SCOTUS Decides TariffsPosted By James Brown |
I think this is a strong and proper separation of powers ruling. Regarding Clarence and Sammy, Rod, I only have one thing to add. This case is not unlike the student loan forgiveness cases where Biden clearly overstepped his authority and the court reined him in.Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
I KNEW Clarence and Sammy would rule in Trump's favor. If it had been Biden instead of Trump, they would have been their proverbial "originalists" that noted the tariffs issue, as per the constitution, resides in the purview of the congress in this case, and would have sided with the majority opinion.
In the student loan cases, the three liberals on the court supported Biden‘s “creative” reading of the scope of executive authority under the appropriate statutes. the three liberals on the court supported Biden‘s illegal power grab. of course, Clarence and Sammy were in the majority that time appropriately arguing for a limitation on executive authority. The liberals on the court and Clarence/Sammy flipped in this case, Gorsuch called them to task in a separate opinion for their inconsistency.
So, in this one instance, if you want to call Clarence, Sammy, Keegan, Sotomayor, Ketanji-Brown, and Kavanaugh “political hacks” for their flip-flop on very similar executive authority cases. I am not going to argue with you. You gotta call ‘em all out though.