Posts Made By: James Lacey

Originally Posted by Fred Lusk

Here is an interesting take on the Mika Brzeezinski-Joe Biden interview:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_5wv_OPICQ

David Freiheit (a.k.a. Viva Frei) is a Canadian attorney / YouTuber who has covered quite a bit of American politics and law on his channel over the past couple years.  He is pretty insightful and always entertaining.

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi James:

Maybe the story is a nothing burger.  That is the problem in my view.  The difference between the press treatment of Brett Kavanaugh and the press treatment of Joe Biden is glaring, shocking, and inexcusable.  Kavanaugh had a pristine, flawless reputation before the hearing.  Joe Biden does not.  Ms. Reade has significantly better corroboration than Ms. Blasey Ford, Ms. Swetnick, or the third one who recanted.  Ms. Reade has a more plausible story than Ms. Blasey Ford.

Still, Kavanaugh was savaged by the press.  Kavanaugh was savaged in congressional hearings on live TV.  I think that the entirely and dis-functionally partisan DC press corps and the leaders of the Democratic party are to blame, and I personally will never forget.

Jim   

p.s. I don't think this disqualifies Biden, and I don't think he should step aside.  I am willing to accept that his denials are at least (and possibly more persuasive than the allegations.)  My venom is directed solely at the DC press corp and the Democrats who orchestrated the unwarranted character assassination of Brett Kavanaugh.

Originally Posted by Greg Shaffer

I have no problem granting Biden the benefit of the doubt in the absence of hard evidence.....That said there already exists FAR MORE corroborating evidence than there ever was with Kavannah of which there was NONE....

I DO however have a real appreciation of the irony that Biden is now desperately trying to live down his words ie "Women have a right to be believed".....which he has now had to amend with "unless they are talking about me" LOL

Originally Posted by Darian Rachal

Jim, thanks for the information. I guess the Democrat high approval rating is somewhat like members of the USSR Communist Party's approval of Pravda.

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

Look at what the Trump administration is projecting:
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/495971-trump-administration-projecting-3k-daily-coronavirus-deaths-by-june
In addition:
"Deborah Birx, coordinator of the White House coronavirus response, said on "Fox News Sunday" that their projections have always estimated between 100,000 and 240,000 people could die even with mitigation measures in place."

Originally Posted by Darian Rachal

It's pretty easy to trust multiple sources when they are basically nothing more than mouthpieces for the DNC.

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi James:

Biden is no Trump, Kennedy, or Clinton, when it comes to the self-entitled, sexual-predator, disreputable, rapist, scum department.  I'll concede that.  Biden did not step forth with transparency when first faced with the allegations though.  He waited until the press caved to pressure from the outside and stopped pretending that Ms. Reade did not exist.  It took over two weeks.

I can't really fault Biden for the delay though...  If I were his advisor, I'd have advised him to lay low too, so long as the primary/only press read or viewed by likely D voters buried the story.

Jim   

Originally Posted by Darian Rachal

James, I think you misunderstood my referencing Pravda. I don't know if there were any other news sources allowed in the USSR rather than Pravda, but the MSM of multiple sources is a monolith, essentially like Pravda. How often do you hear the leftist idiots in the media from various networks all use the same words or phrases in a story? It's almost like they are all getting a command from a higher source. Were you aware that they do this? It's really comical. Rush points this out occasionally.

Originally Posted by Fred Lusk

Men of integrity do NOT meet alone behind a closed door with women who are not family (e.g. wives, daughters, etc.), travel with such women, and so on.  Women of integrity follow a similar rule.  It's not that hard to understand or to follow.  A lot of problems throughout history could have been avoided had the men and women in questions had integrity.

Originally Posted by Fred Lusk

James...

Freiheit focused mostly on Biden's responses to Brzezinski's questions, not the UofD documents, and I think his analysis is pretty accurate.  An attorney friend I have known since junior high school (early 1970s) posted his own, corroborating analysis on his Facebook page a couple days ago.

Biden's responses did him no credit.  He could be 100% innocent of all allegations, yet he came across as someone who couldn't give a straight answer and whose mental agility leaves a lot to be desired.

Fred