KeglersPosted By Dave Snope |
I learned something new today. No, not that Democratic policitians have an insatiable desire to control every tiny aspect of our private lives. That has always been, and always will be. I learned what a "kegler" is.
New York State Senator Patrick Gallivan (R-59th District) New York State Assemblyman Robin Schimminger (D-140th District) are sponsoring a bill that would cover bowling shoes. The bill in the assembly is co-sponsored by Assembly members Brian Kolb, Crystal Peoples-Stokes and Jane Corwin.
It would require alley owners to post signs, warning keglers not to wear bowling shoes outside, lest they become wet and increase the likelihood that a bowler could slip and fall when they come inside.
I find this a bit incongruous**. Aren't slip 'n fall attorneys democrats? And aren't lawyers one of the top two donors to the democrat party?
http://www.wgrz.com/news/article/215495/37/Bowling-Shoe-Law-Being-Debated-in-State-Legislature?utm_source=feedly
** On second thought, I recall having heard a trial lawyer say that putting up signs to warn of a danger implies that the property owner knows of said danger, and is therefore more liable than if he didn't put up signs. I doubt it really matters because history has shown us that these vermin will rationalize any thing from any perspective in order to get other people's money. Probably should just outlaw bowling shoes altogether.
New York State Senator Patrick Gallivan (R-59th District) New York State Assemblyman Robin Schimminger (D-140th District) are sponsoring a bill that would cover bowling shoes. The bill in the assembly is co-sponsored by Assembly members Brian Kolb, Crystal Peoples-Stokes and Jane Corwin.
It would require alley owners to post signs, warning keglers not to wear bowling shoes outside, lest they become wet and increase the likelihood that a bowler could slip and fall when they come inside.
I find this a bit incongruous**. Aren't slip 'n fall attorneys democrats? And aren't lawyers one of the top two donors to the democrat party?
http://www.wgrz.com/news/article/215495/37/Bowling-Shoe-Law-Being-Debated-in-State-Legislature?utm_source=feedly
** On second thought, I recall having heard a trial lawyer say that putting up signs to warn of a danger implies that the property owner knows of said danger, and is therefore more liable than if he didn't put up signs. I doubt it really matters because history has shown us that these vermin will rationalize any thing from any perspective in order to get other people's money. Probably should just outlaw bowling shoes altogether.