Image of the day

Captured by
RICHARD COFER

VdB 141 Ghost Nebula

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Dave Snope

March 27, 2013 12:07 AM Forum: Politics

Unemployment situation in the U.S. is dire

Posted By Dave Snope

In case you forgot, the economy still sucks. Mort Zuckerman in the WSJ gives the lay of the economic landscape and the grand illusion that we are on the right track.


The Great Recession is an apt name for America's current stagnation, but the present phase might also be called the Grand Illusion—because the happy talk and statistics that go with it, especially regarding jobs, give a rosier picture than the facts justify.
...
Despite the most stimulative fiscal policy in American history and a trillion-dollar expansion to the money supply, the economy over the last three years has been declining. After 2.4% annual growth rates in gross domestic product in 2010 and 2011, the economy slowed to 1.5% growth in 2012.
...
the real unemployment rate is somewhere between 14% and 15%.
...
The number of Americans unemployed for six months or longer went up by 89,000 in February to a total of 4.8 million. The average duration of unemployment rose to 36.9 weeks, up from 35.3 weeks in January. The labor-force participation rate, which measures the percentage of working-age people in the workforce, also dropped to 63.5%, the lowest in 30 years. The average workweek is a low 34.5 hours thanks to employers shortening workers' hours or asking employees to take unpaid leave.
...

What the administration gives us is politics. What the country needs are constructive strategies free of ideology. But the risks of future economic shocks will multiply so long as we remain locked in a rancorous political culture with a leadership more inclined to public relations than hardheaded pragmatic recognition of what must be done to restore America's vitality.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323393304578364670697613576.html?mod=opinion_newsreel

March 27, 2013 04:50 PM Forum: No Holds Barred

April 6, 2013 09:47 PM Forum: Politics

Dems Block Measure To Ban EBT Use In Strip Clubs

Posted By Dave Snope

A person on welfare might want a few $10 cokes, and who are we to deny him the money for his right to his soft drink of choice in his favorite local establishment?

“If you’re on the dole, you shouldn’t be on the pole,” the Post quotes one Republican lawmaker as quipping when she brought up the amendment.

When he introduced a bill to ban ATM withdrawals in strip clubs in 2011, Pabon said he was worried that taxpayer money was being paid to strippers rather than used for food or to pay bills. He also cited the typically high withdrawal fees charged at ATMs in adult entertainment businesses.


http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/05/still-ok-to-withdraw-welfare-benefits-at-atms-in-colorado-strip-clubs/

April 15, 2013 03:39 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

M95 and M96

Posted By Dave Snope

A Nice Pair of Spiral Galaxies in Leo.

Optic: TEC160F
Camera: QSI583
Mount: Mach1GTO
LRGB:
L = 9 x 12 min
RGB = 6 x 5 min each bin 2x2

http://www.pbase.com/dsnope/image/149674007

April 15, 2013 03:41 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

NGC4565

Posted By Dave Snope

Here is NGC4565, the Needle Galaxy.

Full frame:
http://www.pbase.com/dsnope/image/149673025

100% crop:
http://www.pbase.com/dsnope/image/149673287

Info:
Optic: TEC160F
Camera: QSI583
Mount: Mach1GTO
LRGB 156/35/35/35
L = 13 x 12min
RGB = 7 x 5min bin 2x2 each

April 20, 2013 10:32 PM Forum: ASTRONOMY

Wow! Check Out The Horsehead Shot By HST

Posted By Dave Snope

Amazingly detailed Horsehead shot in IR to make it almost transparent.

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2013/12/image/a/


May 6, 2013 03:24 PM Forum: Politics

"You should have seen what Clinton tried to do to

Posted By Dave Snope

Hillary: "What difference at this point does it make?"

Sources close to the congressional investigation who have been briefed on what Thompson will testify tell Fox News the veteran counterterrorism official concluded on Sept. 11 that Clinton and Kennedy tried to cut the counterterrorism bureau out of the loop as they and other Obama administration officials weighed how to respond to -- and characterize -- the Benghazi attacks.

"You should have seen what (Clinton) tried to do to us that night," the second official in State's counterterrorism bureau told colleagues back in October. Those comments would appear to be corroborated by Thompson's forthcoming testimony.


Documents from the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Council, first published in the May 13 edition of "The Weekly Standard," showed that senior officials from those agencies decided within days of the attacks to delete all references to Al Qaeda's known involvement in them from "talking points" being prepared for those administration officers being sent out to discuss the attacks publicly.

Those talking points -- and indeed, the statements of all senior Obama administration officials who commented publicly on Benghazi during the early days after the attacks -- sought instead to depict the Americans' deaths as the result of a spontaneous protest that went awry. The administration later acknowledged that there had been no such protest, as evidence mounted that Al Qaeda-linked terrorists had participated in the attacks. The latter conclusion had figured prominently in the earliest CIA drafts of the talking points, but was stricken by an ad hoc group of senior officials controlling the drafting process. Among those involved in prodding the deletions, the documents published by "The Weekly Standard" show, was State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland, who wrote at one point that the revisions were not sufficient to satisfy "my building's leadership."

The allegations of the two counterterrorism officials stand to return the former secretary of state to the center of the Benghazi story. Widely regarded as a leading potential candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016, Clinton has insisted she was not privy to decisions made by underlings about the inadequate security for the U.S. installations in Benghazi that were made in the run-up to the attacks. And she has portrayed her role -- once the attacks became known in Washington -- as that of a determined fact-finder who worked with colleagues to fashion the best possible response to the crisis.



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/05/05/clinton-sought-end-run-around-counterterrorism-bureau-on-night-benghazi-attack/

May 14, 2013 05:45 PM Forum: Politics

Another Shoe About To Drop On Obama

Posted By Dave Snope


joseph curl: CIA source says still one more shoe to drop. Yes, four shoes. Dead ambassador, tapped phones, IRS probes. Will it be worse? Can it be?!

Even as the IRS scandal rises to the top and widens to offices accross the U.S., and now includes the IRS leaking conservative group info to the media, I think that he missed a few. The coverup. The ongoing EPA abuse scandal. The Obama donors getting 80% of the DOE contracts, and the failed green company loans. The fed contractors required to reveal their donors. HHS selling Obamacare indulgences and HHS's Katherine Sibelius extorting money from the healthcare industry. Sending Libyan shoulder-launched missiles to the Al-Qaeda controlled Syrian fighters. Fast and Furious has almost disappeared under all this noise. Hmmm, I'm sure that I've missed a few but that is only from Dear Leader's current term.

There are currently five separate committee investigations into the attack on a U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, and a probe into Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius raising millions of dollars to promote Obamacare. Ways and Means is demanding answers to seven questions on this matter, as well.

All together, roughly one-third of House committees are engaged in investigating some aspect of the Obama administration.


Now Attorney General Holder has recused himself from leak probe related to the AP wiretaps.


May 17, 2013 07:00 PM Forum: Politics

Obama's Hand Picked Ambassador To Costa Rica

Posted By Dave Snope

Obama’s hand-picked U.S. Ambassador to Costa Rica, Anne Andrews, has used her U.S. Embassy employees in a ridiculous music video to get more Costa Rican's to apply for U.S. immigration visas. Are there any serious professionals in the Obama admin? Or are they all apparatchiks working to increase the democrat party voter base?

Because apparently, we don't have enough latin american immigrants overstaying their visas so we have to advertise in their countries.

The utterly embarassing sophomoric video here. Paid for by you. Not recommended for tax payers with heart maladies:
http://youtu.be/2U-SVPpqCiw

Her job description is equally ludicrous:

...advancing environmental security particularly by promoting clean energy, conservation, and sustainable development. Additional priority programs for the Ambassador include the President’s National Export Initiative; Economic Empowerment of Women; and English language skills for youth...

These have nothing to do with the American people's interests, they are Democratic party talking points.

May 24, 2013 12:12 AM Forum: Politics

A Reminder About Leopard, Spots

Posted By Dave Snope

This article from 2008 reminds us about Hillary Clinton's storied history of prevarication. Useful background for those observing her Benghazi B.S.

The former general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, who supervised Hillary during the Watergate investigation, says her history of lies and unethical behavior goes back farther – and goes much deeper – than anyone realizes.

. . .

'A lifelong Democrat, Mr. Zeifman supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy’s chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation – one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman’s 17-year career.'

Why?

"Because she was a liar," Zeifman said in an interview last week. “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.'

http://digitaljournal.com/article/252624