Libya, situation appears to be getting worse:Posted By david elosser |
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html
According to senior diplomatic sources, the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted, but no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and "lockdown", under which movement is severely restricted.
Senior officials are increasingly convinced, however, that the ferocious nature of the Benghazi attack, [which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and others] in which rocket-propelled grenades were used, indicated it was not the result of spontaneous anger due to the video, called Innocence of Muslims. Patrick Kennedy, Under-Secretary at the State Department, said he was convinced the assault was planned due to its extensive nature and the proliferation of weapons.
Now I ask all of you: what has the narrative of the main stream media been since the attacks? Spontaneous anger because of some video! Really? And just what created this breakdown of intel communications to our consulates and embassies in Arab countries? What did Obama know and when did he know it? Just what is his job as President of the US when it comes to intellegence gathering and using that intellegence to protect Americans both here and abroad? Did Hillary Clinton know of this intel? If so did she make any efforts to warn our diplomats? These are questions that the MSM will not ask, so I ask them here. No, the MSM is more interested in getting together and figuring out how to make Romney look bad.
David E
According to senior diplomatic sources, the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted, but no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and "lockdown", under which movement is severely restricted.
Senior officials are increasingly convinced, however, that the ferocious nature of the Benghazi attack, [which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and others] in which rocket-propelled grenades were used, indicated it was not the result of spontaneous anger due to the video, called Innocence of Muslims. Patrick Kennedy, Under-Secretary at the State Department, said he was convinced the assault was planned due to its extensive nature and the proliferation of weapons.
Now I ask all of you: what has the narrative of the main stream media been since the attacks? Spontaneous anger because of some video! Really? And just what created this breakdown of intel communications to our consulates and embassies in Arab countries? What did Obama know and when did he know it? Just what is his job as President of the US when it comes to intellegence gathering and using that intellegence to protect Americans both here and abroad? Did Hillary Clinton know of this intel? If so did she make any efforts to warn our diplomats? These are questions that the MSM will not ask, so I ask them here. No, the MSM is more interested in getting together and figuring out how to make Romney look bad.
David E