Its so funny that they cannot give it up.
Let's talk about facts here so far, which none of the leftists or the TDS sufferers want to mention.
They conveniently avoid it, with one fool saying "he definitely would have been convicted in a regular court" or "its a done deal" in a civil trial.
Totally absurd and I'll provide evidence to show why.
Let's consider the "JURORS". LOL!
In the impeachment we had partisan hacks who were the jurors, who had already made up their minds that he was guilty.
In fact the JUDGE himself Pat Leahy said he was voting to convict, and yet not one of the left or the TDS sufferers here mention that little
pertinent factoid.
Yeah, that's some objective "trial" there isn't it?
Let me just posit here and inform the leftists and the TDS sufferers who claim that the "burden of proof" would be much less in a civil trial, of this fact:
The jury in a REAL trial wouldn't be made up of BIASED Leftist Democrats which is what occurred in the Impeachment "Trial".
I guess you didn't consider that.
In a REAL trial, the judge wouldn't have openly boasted that the accused was GUILTY and the judge wouldn't say that he was voting to convict.
I guess you didn't consider that.
In a REAL trial there would be Due Process, unlike the Impeachment "trial".
I guess you didn't consider that.
in a REAL trial, the jury would go through the Voir dire process and the most biased ones would be thrown out.
I guess you didn't consider that.
Now then, let's talk about the
evidence that was presented by the leftist frauds, and Democrat deceivers in the Senate.
It was doctored, i.e. selectively edited by the Biased Democrat Senators, the ones who changed dates, doctored the images, and doctored the words of the 'accused'.
Had they done that, knowingly doctor evidence and submit fraudulent evidence, in a REAL court of law instead of their witch tribunal, a REAL judge would not only probably throw the case out, he would most likely sanction the lawyers who did it, and possibly refer THEM to the bar assn for disbarment.
Those are the facts.
If this were a REAL trial the accused would have been given DUE PROCESS, to defend himself when charged, unlike this sham impeachment undertaken by leftist hacks.
And yet all these leftist TDS suffering
"scholars" of the legal system here on this forum don't bother to mention or even consider those 'facts' now do they, when they put up their postings? LOL
Those are the inconvenient
facts that they conveniently avoid considering or even mentioning in their haste to claim and imply that it would be more of a cake walk in a civil trial than it would be in the Impeachment, and in the impeachment 'trial' the left failed miserably didn't they?
I'll answer that, YES they
failed miserably. Andrew Johnson was MUCH closer to being convicted than was Trump.
They needed another 10 Senators, 10% of the Senate to vote with them in order to convict Trump.
Andrew Johnson just needed 1 more to convict him.
And now how about the people who REALLY incited a riot, not only incited it, but bailed rioters out of jail, violent ones, who went out and committed MORE violence.
That would be Kamala Harris, the VP who not only advocated for and told the rioters all over the nation that
they should not stop, but actually paid their bail to get them out of jail, and at least one went out and did it again.
If anyone deserves impeachment, that hypocritical cretin does.
Now let's just talk about the leftist actors here in this fraudulent play, game, and scheme and who brought forth the Impeachment charges.
One of the biggest clowns was this Jamie Raskin fool, who got up on his high horse to rip everyone the right in the US Congress for objecting to the electors. He had choice words for them, one being that they were not abiding by their
oath to the Constitution.
Yet, this very clown of a Congressturd in his first days of becoming a congressman, did what in 2017?
I'll tell you what this sanctimonious asshole did. In 2017
He himself objected to the Florida electors who voted for Trump, making a statement on the floor of the Congress.
I guess it is perfectly fine for this piece of leftist garbage to violate his
oath to the Constitution, eh?
Does it get any MORE hypocritical than that?
Well, maybe on this forum the leftists are at least
as hypocritical or
more. Its a toss up.
The Trump lawyers did a bang up job. They provided miles of evidence to show that if they (the lying leftist Democrat Senators) were held to the fake standards that Donald Trump was held to, every leftist Democrat Senator would need to be impeached in order to satisfy consistency.
Of course we all know that leftist Democrats here and everywhere, as well as TDS suffering Repubs have Zero consistency, zero principles, and zero character.
Donald Trump's lawyers literally destroyed the lying, deceptive, false arguments, and showed how the leftist Democrat scum purposely doctored evidence in the Senate and Trump's lawyers did so with character, and adherence to the Constitution.
And to even imply that Donald Trump could be held liable by a jury for the deaths of the people who died that day is nearly laughable on its face. Perhaps if they had the same Jurors that were in the Impeachment trial, those scumbags, then they might have a chance, but even then I doubt it.
The entire thing was a clown show meant to satisfy the anger, contempt, and hatred of the leftists here and everywhere as well as the TDS suffering Republicans here and everywhere.
It was a clown show for the Democrat clowns and nothing more.
Addendum: Chuck Schumer stood on the steps of the US Supreme Court and said these inflammatory words:
"I want to tell you Gorsuch, I want to tell you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price!! You won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions".https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/schumer-threatens-supreme-court-justices-gorsuch-and-kavanaugh-you-will-pay-the-price-you-wont-know-what-hit-you-video/After that, the mob descended on the Supreme Court and tried to beat down the doors.
So which cowardly TDS suffering Republican or cowardly hypocritical Leftist Democrat on this forum, wants to make an excuse as to why Chuck Schumer should not be impeached as Donald Trump was?
Any takers out there?
Well I sort of fixed it.
