Re: Maybe this belongs in the Mind Twister ForumPosted By Mike Hart |
Like Descarte or Kant, Pascal was just working backwards with the best knowledge he had. He was trying to build a logical arguements against the skeptics. If you are down to a "single if,then, else" proposition about the existence of God, I think Pascal was argueing in favor of the unknown door #1 (marked Religion) if the assumption is that the other two doors are marked "permenent emptiness" and " eternal damnation."
I think this points to the problem of converstion driven by fear of consequences, it doesn't have to be strongly held.
For a more amusing variation on proofs of God's existence, I always in enjoyed the lighter side of logical arguements presented by Douglas Adams.
http://ling.ucsd.edu/~bakovic/images/babelfish.html
I think this points to the problem of converstion driven by fear of consequences, it doesn't have to be strongly held.
For a more amusing variation on proofs of God's existence, I always in enjoyed the lighter side of logical arguements presented by Douglas Adams.
http://ling.ucsd.edu/~bakovic/images/babelfish.html