Image of the day

Captured by
Lawrence Parchman

Sculptor Galaxy (NGC 253)

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Brett Wylie

November 12, 2004 10:43 PM Forum: Politics

Cultural divide

Posted By Brett Wylie

Here is, I feel, an interesting bit of commentary on the election.

Below is an excerpt from an article in The New Republic by Brad Carson. Carson is the Democrat who ran for Senate in Oklahoma and lost.

Carson's analysis provides insights regarding the great divide among Americans.

"As a defeated Senate candidate in the most red of red states, many people have asked me for insights into the Democratic Party's failure to connect with culturally conservative voters. Much has already been written on this topic, and scholars will add more. But I do know this: The culture war is real, and it is a conflict not merely about some particular policy or legislative item, but about modernity itself. Banning gay marriage or abortion would not be sufficient to heal the cultural gulf that exists in this nation. The culture war is about matters more fundamental still: whether nationality is, in a globalized world, a random fact of no more significance than what hospital one was born in or whether it is the source of identity and even political legitimacy; whether one's self is a matter of choice or whether it is predetermined, before birth, by the cultural membership of one's family; whether an individual is just that--a free-floating atom--or whether the individual is part of a long chain that both predates and continues long after any particular person; whether concepts like honor and shame, which seem so quaint, are still relevant in a world that values only "tolerance." These are questions not for politicians but for philosophers, and, in the end, it is the failure of liberal philosophy that we saw on November 2.
"For the vast majority of Oklahomans--and, I would suspect, voters in other red states--these transcendent cultural concerns are more important than universal health care or raising the minimum wage or preserving farm subsidies. ... (T)he voters aren't deluded or uneducated. They simply reject the notion that material concerns are more real than spiritual or cultural ones. The political left has always had a hard time understanding this, preferring to believe that the masses are enthralled by a "false consciousness" or Fox News or whatever today's excuse might be. But the truth is quite simple: Most voters in a state like Oklahoma--and I venture to say most other Southern and Midwestern states--reject the general direction of American culture and celebrate the political party that promises to reform or revise it.

"That is what Antonin Scalia famously called the Kulturkampf. And there can be no doubt either that this is a fundamental dynamic in American politics or on which side of this conflict the electorate rests. Last Tuesday, I ran 7 percent ahead of John Kerry, and my opponent ran a full 13 percent behind President Bush. In most states, this would have been more than sufficient to ensure my victory. But not in Oklahoma. At least not last Tuesday. And, while the defeat was all my own, the failure was of the party to which I swear allegiance, which uncritically embraces a modernity that so many others reject."




November 12, 2004 10:50 PM Forum: Politics

Re: Eerie parallels between wars in Vietnam and Ir

Posted By Brett Wylie

Ray,
In the November 25th issue of Rolling Stone magazine..there is a short two page section with interviews of U.S. military commanders commenting on the Iraq war situation. A very good read worth picking thru.

November 19, 2004 06:38 AM Forum: Politics

Re: Latest news: Iran and Missiles with Nukes

Posted By Brett Wylie

It would do a lot of Americans some good, including our c-grade in history college student Bush, if they would just sit down and read some world history and think about the actions of "the insurgents/terrorists" from their historical viewpoint. They have good reasons to hate a combo U.S./British invasion into their territory. Along with the good American actions overseas, there are some really ugly hypocritical self-serving failures. Iran, 1953, British Petroleum, CIA,....being one of them.
There are several historical recounts on the web..I get some historical comments first hand, as a great person/doctor I work with is from Iran.

See: http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2002/0228tbwt.htm

And here:http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~ulm/history/mossadegh.htm

November 30, 2004 07:40 AM Forum: Politics

Re: They all lie, Democrats and Republicans

Posted By Brett Wylie

This country spends 40 times the amount on weaponry that the 11 "axis of evil" countries do, combined. And we need to. We have to stay ahead. We desperately need to. We have to defend ourselves against all the weapons we sell on export to dictators, thugs, religous fanatics, and other malcontents.
I've been thinking, maybe we are going about this all wrong. I'm sure we can get Osama switched back over to our side again. I mean, we found use for the Nazi rocket scientists, didn't we? We forgave them for providing the weapons that "murdered" thousands of Brits. :S Osama bin Laden; He was a bad guy all along, just that at one time he was a murderous religous fanatic bastard fighting the Ruskies, instead of a murderous religous fanatic bastard fighting us! Maybe we can get Putin to invade some other Muslim country so we don't look so bad, in their eyes only. The Russians were sadistically cruel in Afghanistan. We can depend on them. If we could instigate a repeat we might have a situation overseas similar to most of the elections I've voted in, in this country...the Muslims would be forced to pick the lesser of two evils! That would certainly leave us lookin gude.

December 12, 2004 10:20 PM Forum: Politics

Re: To my conservative friends, a history lesson

Posted By Brett Wylie

sad

We politically/militarily supported a very small segment of the society in Viet Nam. We did not support or address the wants and desires of the vast majority of Vietnamese, the working poor, issues such as wealth redistribution and land reform, something the N.Vietnamese communists were promising. We "helped" choose the leaders in S. VietNam out of the (1-3%) which owned 90%+ of all the farming land and wealth of the country. Working farmers were basically indentured servants, working someone else's land.

The fact there are Shiites attacking and killing American soldiers is all the information we need to know to realize that Iraq is out of control. Thats nationalism for you. We free a majority segment of the population from control by a hated minority and they turn on us. The only group that isn't shooting us in the back, so far, are the Kurds..at least as far as we know.

December 12, 2004 10:23 PM Forum: Politics

Re: To my conservative friends, a history lesson

Posted By Brett Wylie

Action report President Kennedy:

Record of Action No. 2472, Taken at the 519th Meeting of the National Security Council, Washington, October 2, 1963
McNAMARA-TAYLOR REPORT ON VIETNAM

a. Endorsed the basic presentation on Vietnam made by Secretary McNamara and General Taylor.

b. Noted the President's approval of the following statement of U.S. policy which was later released to the press:

1. The security of South Viet Nam is a major interest of the United States as other free nations. We will adhere to our policy of working with the people and Government of South Viet Nam to deny this country to Communism and to suppress the externally stimulated and supported insurgency of the Viet Cong as promptly as possible. Effective performance in this undertaking is the central objective of our policy in South Viet Nam.

2. The military program in South Viet Nam has made progress and is sound in principle, though improvements are being energetically sought.

:S 3. Major U.S. assistance in support of this military effort is needed only until the insurgency has been suppressed or until the national security forces of the Government of South Viet Nam are capable of suppressing it.

:S Secretary McNamara and General Taylor reported their judgment that the major part of the U.S. military task can be completed by the end of 1965, although there may be a continuing requirement for a limited number of U.S. training personnel. They reported that by the end of this year, the U.S. program for training Vietnamese should have progressed to the point where 1,000 U.S. military personnel assigned to South Vietnam can be withdrawn.

:S 4. The political situation in South Viet Nam remains deeply serious. The United States has made clear its continuing opposition to any repressive actions in South Viet Nam. While such actions have not yet significantly affected the military effort, they could do so in the future.

5. It remains the policy of the United States, in South Viet Nam as in other parts of the world, to support the efforts of the people of that country to defeat aggression and to build a peaceful and free society.




December 16, 2004 05:45 AM Forum: Politics

Re: Here is the column

Posted By Brett Wylie

grin I believe this line is from Walt Kelly, Pogo..
"We have met the enemy and he is us."

January 5, 2005 02:51 PM Forum: Investment Discussions

This doesn't make sense! Possible scam? Anyone

Posted By Brett Wylie

8O

We are selling our truck over the net...and have received this series of emails...sure "feels" like a scam...anybody have any experience with this individual type of thing? For somebody who is from the "UK" he sure has a problem with the English language.

Thank you for the reply Brett,i appreciate it and will want you to send the pictures as you have promised.The price is fine by me and want you to take the add off cause i will be buying it.
I will need your full name and address with phone number so that i can forward it to my client in the states who will i will instruct to issue you a cashier's check of $9000.
I know the money is more than the truck price but will need you to do me a favour by wiring the balance to my international shipping agent who will some over to your place for the pick up as soon as payment is made.
Really need the truck and hope all the papers are in place.The information needed to send the balance to my shipper will be emailed to you soon,thank you again and hope to hear from you soon.
Sabastian.


BWylie wrote:
The truck is still for sale, lowest price is 5200, it is in good shape, not mint but not all beat up either, good mechanicals, we will send you photos this weekend..weather has been miserable..and it is dark after work. Cheers, Brett
----- Original Message -----
From: Mr Steve Sabastian
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 1:25 AM
Subject: 1990 Ford F350 Crew Cab Dually $5200


Hello,
Happy New Year. My name is
Mr Steve and i am interested in buying your 1990 Ford F350 Crew Cab Dually which i saw your ad and very much interested in buying.I am from the U.K and also will need to know if you still have it for sale,present conditions and also your last price(will love to see pics too).Thank you and hope to hear from you soon.
Mr Sabastian.


January 12, 2005 03:05 PM Forum: Politics

Re: Oops! I started a war!

Posted By Brett Wylie

:S

The hunt for biological, chemical and nuclear weapons in Iraq (news - web sites) has come to an end nearly two years after President Bush (news - web sites) ordered U.S. troops to disarm Saddam Hussein (news - web sites). The top CIA (news - web sites) weapons hunter is home, and analysts are back at Langley.





• States Flex Prosecutorial Muscle
• 'I Had to Run for My Life'
• Special Report: The Bush Administration
• The Day in Photos

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Search news on
washingtonpost.com




Reuters
Slideshow: Iraq




In interviews, officials who served with the Iraq Survey Group (ISG) said the violence in Iraq, coupled with a lack of new information, led them to fold up the effort shortly before Christmas.


Four months after Charles A. Duelfer, who led the weapons hunt in 2004, submitted an interim report to Congress that contradicted nearly every prewar assertion about Iraq made by top Bush administration officials, a senior intelligence official said the findings will stand as the ISG's final conclusions and will be published this spring.


President Bush, Vice President Cheney and other top administration officials asserted before the U.S. invasion in March 2003 that Iraq was reconstituting its nuclear weapons program, had chemical and biological weapons, and maintained links to al Qaeda affiliates to whom it might give such weapons to use against the United States.


Bush has expressed disappointment that no weapons or weapons programs were found, but the White House has been reluctant to call off the hunt, holding out the possibility that weapons were moved out of Iraq before the war or are well hidden somewhere inside the country. But the intelligence official said that possibility is very small.


Duelfer is back in Washington, finishing some addenda to his September report before it is reprinted.


"There's no particular news in them, just some odds and ends," the intelligence official said. The Government Printing Office will publish it in book form, the official said.


The CIA declined to authorize any official involved in the weapons search to speak on the record for this story. The intelligence official offered an authoritative account of the status of the hunt on the condition of anonymity. The agency did confirm that Duelfer is wrapping up his work and will not be replaced in Baghdad.


The ISG, established to search for weapons but now enmeshed in counterinsurgency work, remains under Pentagon (news - web sites) command and is being led by Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Joseph McMenamin.


Intelligence officials said there is little left for the ISG to investigate because Duelfer's last report answered as many outstanding questions as possible. The ISG has interviewed every person it could find connected to programs that ended more than 10 years ago, and every suspected site within Iraq has been fully searched, or stripped bare by insurgents and thieves, according to several people involved in the weapons hunt.


Satellite photos show that entire facilities have been dismantled, possibly by scrap dealers who sold off parts and equipment to buyers around the world.


"The September 30 report is really pretty much the picture," the intelligence official said.


"We've talked to so many people that someone would have said something. We received nothing that contradicts the picture we've put forward. It's possible there is a supply someplace, but what is much more likely is that [as time goes by] we will find a greater substantiation of the picture that we've already put forward."


Congress allotted hundreds of millions of dollars for the weapons hunt, and there has been no public accounting of the money. A spokesman for the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency said the entire budget and the expenditures would remain classified.


Several hundred military translators and document experts will continue to sift through millions of pages of documents on paper and computer media sitting in a storeroom on a U.S. military base in Qatar.


But their work is focused on material that could support possible war crimes charges or shed light on the fate of Capt. Michael Scott Speicher, a Navy pilot who was shot down in an F/A-18 fighter over central Iraq on Jan. 17, 1991, the opening night of the Persian Gulf War (news - web sites). Although he was initially reported as killed in action, Speicher's status was changed to missing after evidence emerged that he had ejected alive from his aircraft.


The work on documents is not connected to weapons of mass destruction, officials said, and a small group of Iraqi scientists still in U.S. military custody are not being held in connection with weapons investigations, either.





Three people involved with the ISG said the weapons teams made several pleas to the Pentagon to release the scientists, who have been interviewed extensively. All three officials specifically mentioned Gen. Amir Saadi, who was a liaison between Hussein's government and U.N. inspectors; Rihab Taha, a biologist nicknamed "Dr. Germ" years ago by U.N. inspectors; her husband, Amir Rashid, the former oil minister; and Huda Amash, a biologist whose extensive dealings with U.N. inspectors earned her the nickname "Mrs. Anthrax."

None of the scientists has been involved in weapons programs since the 1991 Gulf War, the ISG determined more than a year ago, and all have cooperated with investigators despite nearly two years of jail time without charges. U.S. officials previously said they were being held because their denials of ongoing weapons programs were presumed to be lies; now, they say the scientists are being held in connection with the possible war crimes trials of Iraqis.

It has been more than a year since any Iraqi scientist was arrested in connection with weapons of mass destruction. Many of those questioned and cleared have since left Iraq, one senior official said, acknowledging for the first time that the "brain drain" that has long been feared "is well underway."

"A lot of it is because of the kidnapping industry" in Iraq, the official said. The State Department has been trying to implement programs designed to keep Iraqi scientists from seeking weapons-related work in neighboring countries, such as Syria and Iran.

Since March 2003, nearly a dozen people working for or with the weapons hunt have lost their lives to the insurgency. The most recent deaths came in November, when Duelfer's convoy was attacked during a routine mission around Baghdad and two of his bodyguards were killed.











January 22, 2005 12:37 AM Forum: Off Topic Discussions

Re: Effective management--advice needed (LONG)

Posted By Brett Wylie

I'm a dental director of a public health clinic, staff member of 20 years in same clinic. The best I can say is: give everyone their own bit of responsibility..as with a child..use positive encouragement as much as possible..push people to step out on their own a bit so as to build a proactive lets get the job done team. During staff meetings provide a broad overview of the current situation, give the staff goals to achieve, and let them participate and value their contributions to solving problems within the department. Also see that staff are awarded appropriately when there are improvements. Nothing is more detrimental than having people try, suceed, and nothing is mentioned to them about their sucess..do so especially in front of their working peers. Any "negative" comments should be done privately if possible.