Image of the day

Captured by
Lawrence Parchman

Eastern Veil Nebula

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Mel Maki

April 22, 2019 11:53 PM Forum: Politics

How Long Can the Dems Run With This?

Posted By Mel Maki

That's it?
But the dossier was not true.
Your links against two years of bs is like a boy tinkling in the Mississippi.
When was the last time you said the Dems were wrong?

April 23, 2019 01:22 AM Forum: Politics

How Long Can the Dems Run With This?

Posted By Mel Maki

Every president, guilty or innocent, knows a special counsel ruins the image and historical placing of the presidency. None have came out untarnished.

April 23, 2019 01:39 AM Forum: Politics

How Long Can the Dems Run With This?

Posted By Mel Maki

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck
Why do you guys think Trump said this upon learning of the Mueller investigation.

This is from the report: [W]hen Sessions told the president that a Special Counsel had been appointed, the President slumped back in his chair and said, "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."

That's not what an innocent man would say.
If you read the report he said, "Everyone tells me if you get one of these independent counsels it ruins your presidency. It takes years and years and I can't do anything. This is the worst thing that has ever happened to me."

April 26, 2019 05:14 AM Forum: Politics

Dallas TX has officially gone insane.....

Posted By Mel Maki

Yep, not a good bet to bet on the goodwill of people willing to commit crimes. The Dems are screwing up when they argue for voting rights of inmates, also. These are rights that can be restored to reward the right behavior.

May 2, 2019 06:28 AM Forum: Politics

Barr's Bull

Posted By Mel Maki

Many Dems thought the report was the first step in impeachment. Now Barr is in the way.
They need to damage Barr the best they can. Some want him him impeached. 
Dems might take some damage later. A damaged Barr could only help them.

May 2, 2019 06:43 AM Forum: Politics

Barr's Bull

Posted By Mel Maki

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Yes, and that is what has happened to the Democrat side of the aisle.  They promoted a completely fabricated Lie and they cannot bring themselves to speak the truth now.  They just keep running with that lie, and they drag their unquestioning sycophants like yourself along with them.  
So the Dems keep pursuing this, people do not cooperate, Barr doesn't help the Dems, things are tied up in the courts for months, and then it is election time. Who has the advantage?

May 2, 2019 08:25 AM Forum: Politics

Barr's Bull

Posted By Mel Maki

If I was a Dem I'd be disappointed all we had today was "the letter." Much about not much but was a great blue-eyed soul hit in 1967. The vocalist was 18!

May 2, 2019 08:45 AM Forum: Politics

Barr's Bull

Posted By Mel Maki

Originally Posted by Mel Maki
If I was a Dem I'd be disappointed all we had today was "the letter." Much about not much but was a great blue-eyed soul hit in 1967. The vocalist was 18!
Looked it up. He was 16!

May 2, 2019 11:05 AM Forum: Politics

Barr's Bull

Posted By Mel Maki

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
"The facts are these: More than a week after Barr received Mueller's letter expressing concern about how the AG's summary letter had characterized the obstruction evidence -- and talked to Mueller on the phone about it -- he appeared before Congress. And he had this exchange with Florida Democratic Rep. Charlie Crist:
CRIST: Reports have emerged recently, General, that members of the special counsel's team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24 letter, that it does not adequately or accurately portray the report's findings. Do you know what they are referencing with that?
BARR: No, I don't.
Asked about that moment on Wednesday, Barr explained what looks like willful obfuscation -- basically -- this way: I didn't know what specific "reports" Crist was referring to or who on the special counsel's team he was talking about. Therefore, my answer is accurate.
Which is, well, whoa. Or, better put, it is a hugely legalistic answer to the question of whether Barr misled Crist and the broader country. Common sense dictates that, when asked about whether he was aware of any frustrations from the special counsel regarding his four-page letter, the letter from Mueller -- and their subsequent phone conversation -- would jump immediately to mind
Barr can make a lawyerly argument that he didn't understand what Crist was specifically referring to in his question. But that doesn't pass the smell test."

CNN put it very accurately in the above. Mueller had already communicated his overt concerns about the report to Barr and Barr knew it. Oh, I forgot, in Barr's word, Mueller was just being "snitty"... Yeah, right...

May 2, 2019 11:20 AM Forum: Politics

Barr's Bull

Posted By Mel Maki

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
"The facts are these: More than a week after Barr received Mueller's letter expressing concern about how the AG's summary letter had characterized the obstruction evidence -- and talked to Mueller on the phone about it -- he appeared before Congress. And he had this exchange with Florida Democratic Rep. Charlie Crist:
CRIST: Reports have emerged recently, General, that members of the special counsel's team are frustrated at some level with the limited information included in your March 24 letter, that it does not adequately or accurately portray the report's findings. Do you know what they are referencing with that?
BARR: No, I don't.
Asked about that moment on Wednesday, Barr explained what looks like willful obfuscation -- basically -- this way: I didn't know what specific "reports" Crist was referring to or who on the special counsel's team he was talking about. Therefore, my answer is accurate.
Which is, well, whoa. Or, better put, it is a hugely legalistic answer to the question of whether Barr misled Crist and the broader country. Common sense dictates that, when asked about whether he was aware of any frustrations from the special counsel regarding his four-page letter, the letter from Mueller -- and their subsequent phone conversation -- would jump immediately to mind
Barr can make a lawyerly argument that he didn't understand what Crist was specifically referring to in his question. But that doesn't pass the smell test."

CNN put it very accurately in the above. Mueller had already communicated his overt concerns about the report to Barr and Barr knew it. Oh, I forgot, in Barr's word, Mueller was just being "snitty"... Yeah, right...

This letter "issue" isn't one. They are looking for one and they don't have one. History certainly won't make note of it.
K. H. is running for president and she got to do her little thing. Barr is done, Justice Dept. is done and so is this issue. And Comey can keep writing poetry.