Image of the day

Captured by
Douglas Rollain

LBN 576 - The Garlic Nebula

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: David Cotterell

October 20, 2020 02:46 AM Forum: Politics

Christians for Trump?

Posted By David Cotterell

Originally Posted by Mel Maki



I am not religious but I can be annoyed by people that mock or ridicule religious people for no reason other than the belief in God. I have not noticed this forum doing this.

The line I draw is a consistent one and is summed up nicely below...

Someone:  "My Religion says I should not do this...."   Me:  "That's fine. Good for you."

vs

Someone:  My Religion says YOU should not do this...."  Me:  "Go $(%^ yourself!"

Dave

October 20, 2020 08:40 PM Forum: Politics

Christians for Trump?

Posted By David Cotterell

Originally Posted by Russ Carroll

David, you might be surprised to know that the Bible draws the exact same line.
I'm sure it does.

However, there are far, far too many people who are happy to inflict their particular belief system on others.  Many are politicians or in the judiciary or about to be in the judiciary (ACB) or knocking on my door on a sunday morning or missionaries trying to 'save' the residents of some far-flung country.  

Dave 

October 24, 2020 03:23 AM Forum: Politics

Amy Barrett learns of her true place in History....

Posted By David Cotterell

 Rob Donaldson, not a politician of any sort, just a guy, who wrote what he would have said had he had a chance to address Ms. Barrett.   EDITED to reflect reality.



"Judge Barrett, I feel genuinely sorry for you. You have strong credentials and merits. However, you are here not because of them. You are here only because you are a token, a pawn.

Throughout the rest of the history of this country, your name will have an asterisk by it, denoting that your place on the Supreme Court is illegitimate, the result of hypocritical, amoral conniving to turn the Court into a far-right political rubber stamp by two-faced mandarins of a Republican Party destined to go down in flames, consumed by its own internal rot and the fire of its own decrepitude.

You will forever be denied the opportunity to compete truly on your own merits. You are in that seat only because, despite all your protests to the contrary, your record has convinced the GOP king-makers that you will be a reliable robot to help them implement their dark, Hobbesian, plutocratic vision for America.
Object and hide behind high-flown jurisprudential rhetoric all you want, but no one will believe you.

Everyone, Democrat and Republican, knows that you are before us only because the history of your teaching, your scholarship, and your public statements has convinced Trump, McConnell, Leonard Leo, the Koch brothers, and all the billionaire backers of the Federalist Society and the right-wing dark money machine that you will be a reliable Handmaid, doing their bidding even if you yourself don't think so or don't realize it.

I feel sorry for you because you will take the seat of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a titan of American jurisprudence, who will go down in history as everything you will not: independent, her own person, dedicated to the marrow of her bones to equal rights for all, and an implacable foe of anyone, no matter how well-funded or how well-cloaked behind anonymous shell corporations, who tried to push any American into second-class status, any woman into less than full equality, any political activity into the shadows, any marginalized minority into permanent subservience, and any religious bigotry into political power.

You represent the opposite of Justice Ginsburg in every imaginable way: the way you got here, the way you will be counted on to rule, and the ways in which your presence on the Court threatens everything Justice Ginsburg stood for.

This is a sad, sad fate for a woman as accomplished as you. I am profoundly sorry for you, and for our country as you take your illegitimate, corrupted, forever asterisked seat on the Supreme Court."


Copy/paste from the internet...

Dave

October 24, 2020 04:06 AM Forum: Politics

Amy Barrett learns of her true place in History....

Posted By David Cotterell

Originally Posted by James Brown

I'll admit this has me worked up.  This is the most mysogynistic piece of crap I have ever read.  Do you guys really believe ACB won't think for herself?  Seriously?  How pathetic if you do.
Is it misogynistic to praise one woman  while criticizing another?  The article heaps praise on RGB and scorn on ACB....

No.  No it is not.  

Oh, ACB will certainly think for herself alright, a right-wing religious person who is poised to vote against any number of existing policies/laws which are in favour of the rights of women. You know, misogynistically....

 Dave 



 

October 26, 2020 09:48 AM Forum: Politics

We have reached peak weirdness.....

Posted By David Cotterell

Picture from today or yesterday.......

October 26, 2020 09:49 AM Forum: Politics

We have reached peak weirdness.....

Posted By David Cotterell

Lady in the picture with Trump on the left...  Actual photo of Melania on the right......

October 26, 2020 09:51 AM Forum: Politics

We have reached peak weirdness.....

Posted By David Cotterell

Not the same woman.


But why?

Dave

October 26, 2020 08:45 PM Forum: Politics

We have reached peak weirdness.....

Posted By David Cotterell

Fake pics or fake Melania, Jim?

Dave

October 28, 2020 05:28 AM Forum: Politics

It's Befitting He's Swearing In Amy...

Posted By David Cotterell

Originalist?  Like blacks are only 3/5 human and women didn't have the vote?  That kind of originalist?

Dave

October 29, 2020 04:32 AM Forum: Politics

It's Befitting He's Swearing In Amy...

Posted By David Cotterell

"Article 1 of the Constitution, in pertinent part reads as follows:

3. Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other persons."


Now your constitution doesn't say this any more thanks to amendments but it originally did.  Originally.

Do originalists interpret the Constitution as originally written?

Dave