A great question.....Posted By James Lacey |
Originally Posted by Richard Davis
Oh and just for the record here is the proof that James was adamant that it was Russian disinformation and he DID call out the NY Post as being a bunch of liars, contrary to his lies today:
October 16, 2020 09:10 PMForum: Politics
Town Halls
Posted By James Lacey
Originally Posted by Mel Maki
Either the Hunter computer story is one Hell of a hoax or a lot of damning emails have been found that back up charges that Biden has helped Hunter make a truckload of money selling influence. Biden's campaign has not acted like this is one big hoax.
Every hour the emails are looking more damning.
James Lacey stated:
It's worse than a hoax; it's a Russian disinformation intelligence operation. The reason Facebook and Twitter are blocking it, and other media outlets other than Fox News are not reporting it as factual is because it is so obviously a specious story. The White House was even warned by the intelligence community that Russia targeted Guilliani to feed misinformation to Trump.
Now then, is that proof enough or do you want me to post more of what he said back then, which James just lied about, claiming he never said the Laptop story was a lie.
Oh and do you want me to post more lies that James now claims he never said? I'm happy to do it.
As I said, I never said the entire story was a lie or that the laptop was not Hunter's. However, I questioned the laptop's chain of custody and its information. The quote above does nothing to change my claim. As I said, the NYPost is not a good journalistic source. The Blaze is the worst of the worst. Almost all the other sources you quote are awful, and you have zero standing to be critical of other people's sources.
You conveniently forgot to list the post in the same thread where I said:
Posted 10/19/2020 12:58AM | Edited 10/19/2020 01:05AM#25
James Lacey
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: North Richland Hills TX, US
Posts: 3458
Originally Posted by Mel Maki
Why do you think they have not said, "The emails are not Hunter's."
Or, "That is not Hunter's computer."
Mel,
I don't think anyone denies they are Hunter's. There is enough material there to indicate some of what is being produced is authentic clearly. How much of it is authentic, and how much of it is foreign intelligence generated malarkey, though? It's a classic play to hack some authentic material and then intersperse it with compromising lies to lend credibility to the lie.
If anyone cares, below is where the post Rich is claiming "proves" I said the entire Hunter laptop story was a lie.
https://astromart.com/forums/commentary-careful-read-the-terms-of-service/politics/town-halls?page=1#post175105