Posts Made By: James Lacey

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

You don't have a point other than to further the lies of the anti-semitic leftist Scumbags who put forth their hatred of Israel on a minute by minute basis.

Go pick up a book and quit asserting your Bullshit that the State of Israel is occupying anyone's country or region.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Opposition is always welcome, but the Weaponization of the most powerful part of gov't is as dangerous as anything can evolve into and it always does with the left.

That is precisely why the power hungry, totalitarian left has engaged in their lawfare against Donald Trump and his associates, because that is how the totalitarian leftists whom you support wholeheartedly win, when they do. They see that they can be successful in their intimidation tactics, which are disgusting and disgraceful, and those radical leftist Democrats like you will support them and cheer them on. 

The totalitarian leftists whom you support engage in intimidation and threats of imprisonment, in order to achieve their goals, and it happens in most 3rd world nations around the globe.

When the DOJ under Biden engaged in their strongarm and intimidation tactics towards those around Trump, threatening them with imprisonment, and then acting on that intimidation, as they put in Prison Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro, and others, or attempting to bankrupt them, as they did in a few instances, like General Michael Flynn, they proved their methods which were in one's face, stark and direct, and those supporters of their totalitarianism like yourself, loved it.  

Originally Posted by James Brown

Hi James:

I'd say it is not that simple.  The NY prosecution which earned Trump the title of "convicted felon" was a politically motivated farce.  Factually, Trump paid hush money to a porn star and he or his people booked it as "legal fees."  This might be a misdemeanor, but they bumped it up to a felony because of a poorly defined and unproven secondary crime.  One of the possible secondary crimes was election fraud.

For starters, it is inconceivable to me that the jury was instructed to consider three possible secondary crimes without requiring any finding meeting a burden of proof that any of the secondary crimes actually occurred.  I'd bet big money that this verdict is overturned for lack of criminal due process, unless the NY court and prosecutor drop the case to save face.  

Also, Hillary Clinton paid for a bogus opposition research document (The Steele Dossier) through her lawyers.  They booked the payment as "legal fees" to hide the sourcing of the dossier from the public.  I have cites from congressional investigations proving this activity in an older post, if necessary.   It is not illegal to pay for oppo research, and it is not illegal to pay hush money (or as Rich would say, to enter into a non-disclosure agreement).  The crime is apparently putting the payment on the books as "legal fees."  The analogy to Clinton's payment is seamless.  The secondary crime could be election fraud in either case (hiding material information from the public during an election).  If I recall correctly, Clinton was fined by the federal election comission when her payment was discovered.  Trump was not.    I think even listing the election fraud as a secondary crime in the Trump case is bogus too, but apparently the NY Court found it persuasive.

Did NY prosecute Clinton?  Hell no.  The NY case against Trump is bogus and weaponized lawfare of the worst sort.  Half the population calls Trump a "convicted felon" because of this travesty, and I can appreciate why he is angry about that.

It is hard to say whether the GA case is bogus lawfare or a legit prosecution.  The prosecutors in GA messed it up so badly no one can tell.

Did Trump illegally withhold records in violation of the law, resulting in the DOJ asking Jack Smith to prosecute him?  Of course he did.  But so did Biden, Clinton, and apparently Pence.  No prosecutions there.  You can argue, and I appreciate, that Trump's lack of cooperation exacerbated the crime, but he did not destroy evidence like Clinton did.  Here we have at least the appearance of a weaponization of justice.

I was looking forward to hearing the evidence, as it came in at trial, in the J6 case.  Smith again, of course.   Maybe Trump broke the law, maybe he did not, we will never know.  Rod makes a pretty good argument that he did.

I am very comfortable however, saying that 3 outa 4, the NY, GA, and the documents cases were "lawfare" and a unique weaponization of justice.  It is my profound hope that Trump rises above and does not retaliate, but that is, of course, a fool's hope.  The Democrats screwed up immensely when they prosecuted Trump in NY, GA and in the documents case.  Where this ends, I sure do not know.  I know where it started though, and the Ds who cried about the weaponization of justice throughout the campaign were gaslighting and the voters knew it.  J

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

Nah, you're pretty much a Jew hater.  That's quite apparent.  

And in order to occupy a region, one actually needs to have people there occupying it.  

Not to worry though as I've always realized that you understanding a concept as simple as that is asking a heck of lot from you. 

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

You Wrote:

And you are pretty much an idiot incapable of drawing correct conclusions from all available evidence.

No, I'm not an idiot, I'm just basing my statements on the facts that are proven by the question I posed which you were impotent to answer and so you Ignored the question, but then I'm used to your method of ignoring inconvenient questions.  

I'll simply say again, Israel isn't an occupier as you falsely claim in all of your anti-semitic Jew hating fashion.

I pointed out previously and I'll point out again, the very word connotes the truth.  If Israel were occupying any region or nation, they would need people there to occupy it.  

Because terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah call Israel an occupier and You parrot those terrorist groups' language and call them that, doesn't make it so.  

You then stated:   

We have pages and pages of your homophobia, misogyny, xenophobia, and general bigotry to draw upon.

Well that's 4 names that you came up with there to call me, however You seem to have forgotten 1 other name that you usually call me, a sociopath, however you did add a name, xenophobe, so congrats on that! 

I'll remember to look for that soon, when you use your list of pejoratives.     

Lastly You stated:  Bravo, moron

OOPs, I almost forgot.  Is that 5 names you've called me in one posting or 6??   

 

Originally Posted by Russ Carroll

James, he doesn’t want to debate you or anyone about anything. He want to provoke you into attacking him so he can get some perverse sadistic enjoyment out of it. You do not exist to Richard. This is the intellectual equivalent of sexual assault. He’s getting his rocks off at your expense. The more you struggle, the better his climax.

Originally Posted by Jim Moscheck

No, it doesn’t. You just have to mention it every time Maurice posts, though. You are a dick.

Originally Posted by Richard Davis

 
Well, when it is being provided by an imbecilic pig like her, why would anyone be interested in her rancid commentary?   

I'm guessing that normally one would have to go to a brothel inhabited by crack addicted prostitutes to find a woman of her high class and character, but apparently Scientific American decided to hire her as the editor instead.

I wonder how many writers she had to blow to get where she was at because I doubt she got there on her scholastic merits or any other abilities.  

Perhaps she entertained the crowd with a Mexican style Donkey show to rise to her level of editor?

Whaddya' think???  

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/16/politics/video/fema-lawsuit-florida-homes-trump-sign-discrimination-digvid

Basically, according to her, it seems that those backing Trump in more than one state demonstrated hostility towards FEMA crews and therefore the avoidance circumstances followed accordingly...

Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman

It wasn't thrown out moron hence the statements from Smith. 
Biden never had "tons" of classified documents and neither did Clinton or Pence and they cooperated with investigators instead of lying to them and refusing to cooperate in their return. The scale and intent and equivalence aren't even in the same universe...