Hi all,
Just though I would share with everyone a couple of observing reports of comet McNaught from friends in Oz. For it to be better than Hyakutake, it must be truly spectacular.
Why is it, that when I lived in Oz, the best comets were observable from the northern hemisphere.... now that I am stuck in the USA, guess where the best comets are...????!!!!!!!!! :C

>

:C
Mumble, mumble, mumble.........
Maurice
2007 Jan. 19.51 UT: m1=-0.4, Dia.=1', DC=9...naked eye...Andrew Pearce (City Beach, Western Australia)[I am speechless! For those northern hemisphere comet observers who are able to get on a plane to the southern hemisphere, I strongly suggest you do it! My home town of Perth has a forecast of fine and clear skies for the next week with a day time temperature of 30 deg C.
This truly is a Great comet in every sense of the word and in my 25 years of comet observing it is the best I have ever seen and now is well in front of C/1996B2 Hyakutake. The comet is now visible in a dark sky and the tail is truly an awesome sight. I am observing from a local beach and even from the floodlit carpark, the tail appears as a bright plume of smoke over the sand dunes. Lay people down on the beach cannot believe their eyes! The m1 estimate of the coma has significnatly decreased when extinction effects are taken into account, although I have trouble reconciling the quite dramatic drop in the corrected magnitudes as the comet does not seemed to have faded so dramatically to the eye, however I am reporting the corrected magnitude estimate and I am again using Venus and Alpha Centauri as the comparisons.
The coma still contains a non circular central condensation which appears slightly elongated to the ENE. Again the coma appears parabolic in shape although lot thinner and sharper in terms of shape than observations 4-5 days ago. Now to the tail! It is truly remarkable. I am strongly reminded of those famous photographs of Comet West in 1976 with the tail spread out almost perpendicular to the anti-solar direction. These photographs are strikingly similar to what C/2006P1 appears like visually to the naked eye.
The southern edge of the tail is the more strongly defined edge with in effect no actual northern 'edge', it just diffuses away into the sky background. To give you an appreciation of the bend in the tail, it should be noted that the PA of the tail southern edge at the coma is 145 deg. At the end of the discernable southern edge at the extremity, it is PA 35 deg, so in effect there is a full right angle! The straight line measurement from the coma to the southen edge of the tail at the extremity is 20 degrees. The width of the tail at the end is at least 5.5 deg and it could have been wider if not for the diffuseness of the northern edge.
Stiriations(correct spelling?) as were evident in the famous Comet West photographs are plainly visible to the naked eye for C/2006P1. They are visible as distinct 'dark' lines against the backdrop of the tail. Many more stiriations are visible in 20x80B. Words just fail to describe the visual appearance of this comet now!]
Regards
Andrew Pearce
Andrew,
I concur with all the observations. Went to Gin Gin (1 hour north
Perth) last night. The coma of the comet was on the horizon and the tail stretched at least 10 degrees then arced back to the horizon. It kind of reminded me of the arch in Arches National Park. Truly breathtaking. There are streamers in the tail which reminded me of a strong aurora...blinding in my 15x80 binoculars in the dark sky...what can I say?
James Athanasou