Image of the day

Captured by
Craig Bobchin

Coathanger CR 399

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Thomas Dey

April 5, 2017 08:27 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

NexOptic Prototype "Blade" telescope

Posted By Thomas Dey

Hi, Joseph, et al. I sorta researched that concept less than a year ago. The Theory is certainly intriguing, inherently interesting to us optics guys. But (my understanding/take is that) it is an extraordinarily complex way to just---(try to) make a telescope shorter. The principle is closely related to (nearly the same as) other synthetic-phased-aperture radio applications. e.g. the Radio Astronomy VLA. But, at Optical Wavelengths, telescopes are already very small... so all that's left is making it shorter, which is nice, but seems not worth the effort, expense, and complexity. Other detractors are that phasing requirements tend to yield VERY narrow band, narrow field. And it had to be powered and sort/digest all the photons coming in. A "regular" telescope just does that automatically thru the magic of traditional image-forming to transducer (retina or CCD). Even a Fly's Eye does not phase-sort info... Anyway, this flat-scope seems like a cute idea looking for investors or government $$$. Put this in the category of Laser Energetics... theoretically sound / near impossible to economically develop/actualize. Wet dream --- but dreamin' can be nice. I DO hope they succeed! Tom Dey

April 15, 2017 02:07 PM Forum: AstroMart FAQ

Not seeing pictures in classifieds ads

Posted By Thomas Dey

4/15 10 a.m. EDT. mine look fine Tom

April 28, 2017 01:00 PM Forum: Digital SLR AstroPhotography

Fox Fur Nebula

Posted By Thomas Dey

Nice stuff! A real gas. Lota stuff in the universe. Tom

April 28, 2017 05:40 PM Forum: Global Warming - REAL or NOT

"We were lied to. We were lied to in order to adva

Posted By Thomas Dey

Unfortunately, EVERYTHING that comes out of Washington, the States, Cities, Towns, academia,... is completely spun by political agendas. In particulat, courts and scientifics are part of government and academia. Their frequent "Harumph, We are judges, teachers, scientists are NOT to be questioned to as to motive." B.S. Same comment regarding the Holy FBI, CIA, Police, Military. Honorable professions? Yes! Subject to personal and political bias - OF COURSE! Global Warming/Cooling/Change has become totally contaminated/compromised by politics. How else to explain the contention that discussion is NOT welcome? Tom

May 8, 2017 12:05 PM Forum: ASTRONOMY

mirror refinishing

Posted By Thomas Dey

Do you mean "reflector" with the primary mirror at the bottom of the tube? If so, EMF "Evaporated Metal Films" in Ithaca, NY is great and may be closer. They do very large mirrors, commonly hand-delivered by the owners. I took 29 and 36-inch mirrors there. Your Edmund mirror is 6 or 8 inches? If so, I would recommend OWL "Optic Wave Labs" good price, great quality, and will even test your mirror for wavefront. Shipping mirrors in that size is easy. Cary has an on-line video showing how to pack for shipping. There are other good coating places that others may recommend. You should get the small mirror at the top recoated along with the big mirror. Tom Dey

May 22, 2017 04:36 AM Forum: Astro-Physics

careers in astronomy/astrophysics

Posted By Thomas Dey

Hi, Carter, this is something that I actually know something about. I'm a retired aerospace engineer/scientist. There are probably easier, more lucrative, and stable ways to make a living. But the sciences are fun, challenging, and exciting. For what it's worth, astronomer is... sigh... one of the lowest-paying Ph.D. jobs around. And far more astronomers than jobs in the field. But in aerospace, you can make very good dough hooked-up with one of the big aerospace companies. To put it honestly, need to be better than just good... their top scientists are quite uniformly outstanding. It's certainly worth considering! Tom

May 30, 2017 12:25 AM Forum: Beginning Astronomy?

Starting over - Telescope and Astrophotography - E

Posted By Thomas Dey

Hi Shawn,
Picking up on Floyd's consul, incremental progression is the most enjoyable / least frustrating. Visual constellations, binox, scope then piggyback constellation pics, then more ambitious telescopic imaging. That could take a couple+ years... but well worth it. By then, you will know what equipment and specialty you want, and probably have touched base with locals already into that stuff. There is no one right pursuit; we each find our own. Regarding the Great Eclipse: Totality is only a couple of minutes! If wanting to do imagery, MUST simulate/practice with your equipment well ahead of time. And make it as automatic as possible else miss WATCHING the event! A friend asked me to assist Crowd Control during Eclipse Totality. I gave a polite but emphatic "NO." From few min before Totality to few min after... we all should share only "Ooohs and Ahhhs." Tom

June 1, 2017 03:45 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

Galaxies in Leo

Posted By Thomas Dey

Thanx! Nice combo: "stressed" 3187, neighboring rat-tails, and a ring... Gota love galaxies for their infinitely eclectic morphologies. It's a BIG universe, even one little corner. Tom

June 2, 2017 01:44 AM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Solar System

Moon from last night

Posted By Thomas Dey

Hi, Rolando; very nice! I was looking at it last night (APM 100mm ~APO~ Binos) Must have been almost same time because that Crater Maurolycus (terminator near bottom of pic) central peak sunrise just illum just like your pic. Your processing nice; matches the visual appearance just as I recall it. Tom

June 5, 2017 10:00 PM Forum: CCD Imaging and Processing/Deep Sky

First light from old Danish 20" telescope

Posted By Thomas Dey

Hi Rolando, Very nice! And your mention of the corrector provided a nice gestalt. Years ago, one of our optics teachers had us design equivalent 2-mirror scopes: Classic Cass, Dahl, Gregorian, Ritchey, and then compare their theoretical performance. Only the Ritchey had good stigmatic field. Dahl was pathetic off-axis. But we never did refractive field groups. Now I understand why the field-widened Dahls (with correctors) are so popular. And still enjoys the simplicity of the spherical SM for fab and alignment. The teacher was Daniel Malacara, circa 1979... Tom