Originally Posted by Rod Kaufman
I still don't see Fred, Rich or Greg addressing the initial post of this thread, especially with regards to Fred's "excellent post", the one in which he calls the murders by gun violence with the particular set of stats he refers to as "statistically insignificant." But nowhere in Fred's "excellent post" did he reference gun violence related to assaults, wounded, maimed or paralyzed patients, the same kinds of patients modern medicine saves and who would otherwise appear in Fred's "statistically insignificant" numbers. You know, the very ones the trauma surgeons are talking about in the post.
And the NRA's response to all of this? "Stay in your lane"...
Geez..
Oh"
"But when it comes to gun deaths per capita, the U.S. ranks 20th, at a rate of 10.6 per 100,000 deaths — putting it on par with the Dominican Republic. Many places with high gun death rates had fewer deaths than the U.S. because of smaller populations."
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/theres-a-new-global-ranking-of-gun-deaths-heres-where-the-u-s-stands
I know if the US stats were fifty percent better than they are the same anti-gunners would be saying the same things. Also, people that aren't comfortable using guns don't want anybody to have them. A lot of people have decided they are sure they will never be in a situation where access to a gun could help them. And they are sure they will never be able to acquire the ability to own and care for a gun without something terrible happening. But they don't worry about it because they have decided if they don't think about it, it can't happen. They are probably right. They probably have only two days of food, also.