Jim, your argument can be reduced to simple semantics. I don't think any politician has cornered the market on shifting positions. What is more important is what the
consequences are when positions are shifted... or in the case of GWB, what the consequences are of most of the positions he takes period. In other words, I think you are missing the greater point. Too bad that sentiment expressed by the hippocratic oath isn't followed by these people in positions of power: "First do no harm". In the case of GWB it ought to be tattooed on his forehead; maybe then he could remember it. OK, you can return to your regular program of denial now.