Dems Want To Reward Scandal!Posted By Tony Aguire |
Well the great(?) debate is almost over.Posted By Tony Aguire |
Repair of CI-700 dsc encoderPosted By Tony Aguire |
Obama`s AmericaPosted By Tony Aguire |
My fellow prisoners.......Posted By Tony Aguire |
McCain opens mouth to change feet....Posted By Tony Aguire |
Is it time for Atlas to Shrug?Posted By Tony Aguire |
ABC calls PennPosted By Tony Aguire |
6:34 AZ Time....Posted By Tony Aguire |
Celestron 8 Fork vs GEM vs MeadePosted By Tony Aguire |
Danny Lesandrini said:
Well, I've got an itch to get a better telescope, and I've been looking at a couple of models. I really like my Celestron 5i with NexStar, so upgrading to an 8" seemed logical. I've been told to stay away from the single fork, so the question is, which would you prefer, the Double-Fork mount or a GEM mount?
Now, I think the Celestron is an f10, right? I've also been looking at the f4 Meade LXD75 SN-10 (Schmidt Newtonian). I would like to do some imaging some day, but probably never anything to extreme. Still, I have these concerns about the Meade. Can anyone confirm or deny ...
1) The Meade mount with this 36" tube SN-10 might be susceptible to vibration
2) I could replace the Meade GEM with a portable pier to mitigate the vibration
3) The Meade AutoStar GoTo works great but is very noisy.
I could get a used Meade SN-10 for $1000 or a Celestron Nexstar 8" GEM for $1500, both advertised locally on Craigslist. A little research suggests that I'll end up spending $500 on the Meade to get a new focuser and spotting scope, so consider the prices to be comparable. Which would you prefer, and why?
