Obama's favorite word...Posted By Rob Wiederrich |
LOL...oh man I laughed so hard....good post Mike.
Obama's favorite word...Posted By Rob Wiederrich |
Liberal vs Conservative: Biological?Posted By Rob Wiederrich |
The difference between Bush and Obama...Posted By Rob Wiederrich |
Tony Aguire said:
Obama appreciates a good brew, Bush just abuses them...
http://www.craftbeer.com/pages/stories/craft-beer-muses/show?title=oregon-hops-take-on-the-secret-service
Obama '12![]()
Did Obama really trip up bad on this one?Posted By Rob Wiederrich |
Greg Shaffer said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=VJgY86nmEHc
I am betting this one picks up steam fast and cant wait to hear the explanations as I am sure they will be more than entertaining.....
The Easiest Incumbent to Beat since 1980Posted By Rob Wiederrich |
Darian Rachal said:
This is just a short opinion article that I think may have some merit. The more I think about the characterization of Obama as the first "affirmative action" President, the more the label seems appropriate. AFAIC, 'affirmative action' is nothing more than giving a job to a less-qualified applicant simply because of skin color.![]()
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/05/09/easiest-incumbent-to-beat-since-1980/
Get Yer Obama SEAL Action FigurePosted By Rob Wiederrich |
Barack: High Unemployment Due To Gov Worker LayoffsPosted By Rob Wiederrich |
10" refractor in Gold Mtn ObservatoryPosted By Rob Wiederrich |
Jupiter with Nikon D70Posted By Rob Wiederrich |
What is an anastigmatic refractor objective?Posted By Rob Wiederrich |
Patrick Kelly said:
I've seen this in several manufacturer "ads" now as something special. I understand it pertains to the lack of particular optical aberrations i.e. perfect lens. Without digging into "Telescope Optics..." I'm curious if the highest quality apos like AP/TEC etc as well as maybe the D&G achromats...all of which are painstakingly figured and corrected to eliminate secondary aberrations ('cept for focal length related CA in the latter) can also be considered "anastigmatic"? My gut tells me this may be just marketing mumbo-jumbo to separate themselves from the pack and impress the impressible, or is this actually a valid optical attribute only the luckiest and most fortunate telescope users should pursue?
Thanks, Pat