Image of the day

Captured by
Michael Scherman

Dual Clusters near Antares

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Doug Peterson

August 15, 2004 11:46 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Giant Binos 25x40x120mm

Posted By Doug Peterson

For those who are wondering:

1) Weight about 35 pounds.
2) Identical in detail to the various 100mm single-body versions out there, just bigger.
3) The objectives are achromatic-doublets, rather than the achromatic-triplets of the 100mm versions, which is probably a good thing.
4) They are razor sharp at 40x. I do mean: razor_sharp.
5) Pale blue secondary spectrum is unobtrusive and quite unobjectionable.
6) Like the 100mms, their included tripod and post-type mount with verical fine motion works okay terrestrially, and up to about 60 deg. For the sky some sort of heavier-duty parallelogram-type mount is the ultimate answer.
7) The rotating-turret oculars (with straight-thru porros) are decent Erfle types and do the job well.

Let's see, USN Big Eyes are $20k, Nikon's are $8K, Vixen's about $4k. As the 100mm versions go for around $1500, I would expect these to go for $2.5k+ in the US.

August 19, 2004 09:28 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Celestron 100mm ED Spotting Scope

Posted By Doug Peterson

Looking at the problem closer, it appears to be most likely tilt in the prism cluster rather than wedge in the objective. About one wave of coma.

BTW, infinity focus cannot be reached, I had to use nearby glints for the star test. I tried several other oculars without success. The zoom resembles the LV zoom superficially but does not appear to be a direct copy.

We will see if the next one delivers the goods. I still think the color correction is good. Also the glass is very clean, and all the surfaces appear uniformly multicoated. The main tube is plastic, but with the rubber-armoring at the prism end the overall effect is not bad.

September 29, 2004 01:33 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Are you an EXPERT? What is this thing?

Posted By Doug Peterson

If it has an optical window then it is probably the Celestron Comet Catcher, a Schmidt-newtonian RFT. I owned one, not very good at high powers, and because of the huge secondary obstruction, not very good at low powers either.

September 29, 2004 07:54 PM Forum: Refractors

D&G Achromat and Chromacor

Posted By Doug Peterson

I use a Chromacor for my 8" F12 D&G and it works fabulously. Valery gave me a distance of 304mm, I had to shorten the tube, but it was worth it believe me. The Aries Yahoo discussion group has a lot of info.

October 3, 2004 04:03 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

FS 102 Case

Posted By Doug Peterson

I don't see how you can beat the Tenba case Takahashi sells for the FS102. Bulletproof but light, very well made, and not THAT expensive considering the valuables it protects.

October 31, 2004 04:34 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Brandon 94mm refractor focuser question

Posted By Doug Peterson

You might try a complete regrease, as these are more than a decade old now. I have had two and I thought they had a very light smooth feel, at least when new.

November 20, 2004 06:17 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Borg 76 ED vs. Megrez 80 II ED

Posted By Doug Peterson

A friend returned two Borg ED objectives, they had lousy wavefront quality, both measured interferometrically and visually. The Megrez II doublet has had some quality control issues. The MII F7 ED triplet I have is absolutely fabulous and a best buy.

December 4, 2004 08:07 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Re: Skywatcher 120mm ED Refractor

Posted By Doug Peterson

I am amazed at how the lid can be kept on these secrets. The rumours of a 100mm ED from Orion only surfaced the day before the announcement.

Maybe the government really has been keeping the secret of The Real Truth About What Is Really Going On a secret as well (apologies to X-Files fans)?

December 11, 2004 09:30 AM Forum: Maksutovs

Looking for info on Atomic Labs Mak..Anyone?

Posted By Doug Peterson

Does it look something like this?

http://home.europa.com/~telscope/tinsley5.jpg

December 12, 2004 12:30 AM Forum: Celestron

Opinion on GPS11

Posted By Doug Peterson

I was pleasantly suprised that my 11 turned out to be even better (est. ~1/10 wave spherical correction) than my 12" Meade LX200 (~1/8 correction, based on abberator star test). Let me say that the 11 is far easier to handle from a weight and bulk standpoint, must be placement of the handles, and the molded curves because the 10lbs difference alone can't be responsible.