Jim Babcock said:
None of the above. Being the diverse party that believes in freedom of speech and democracy, we believe that at this time it is not important for us to appoint any one person to speak for us. The Dems are in complete control of the government and likely will remain so for 3.5 years. We are happy having Obama being the focal point for political discord. Appointing a single voice for the right would deflect the well deserved attention that the dictator gets daily. I know that it is frustrating for the libs to not have a person to make the devil as a focal point. The left has attempted to choose a leader for us, but it will not work. The idiot in the White House will remain the focus. Nice try though.
Jim, your quote above indicates you are a member of the Republican party. I am curious as to what your aim is with your posts in general. I believe that the tone, nature and partial factoids would lead a person away from the party. Have you ever considered that? If your intent is to "get back" at those who posted when the previous person was President, that is a bit shallow IMHO. I have considered that you are an undercover liberal Democrat, whose anti-Obama rants are intended to steer fair minded Conservatives to the left. Can't you see that as a likely outcome? It is. And demonstrative of some of the problems with the current Republican Party. You are almost like PETA or NOW of the Democrat Party of the past. It turned a lot of people off. I am just curious of your intent.