Appropriate reliance on scripturePosted By Mike Hart |
Even if the Bible is 100% correct, it is far from being 100% complete. So if you attempt to interpolate the truth about the world and all that is in it using the Bible as your only guide, don't you end up like the blind men who define the elephant from very correct but highly limited perspectives?
One of my problems with turning to the Bible to explain or rationalize the challenges of existence is that it is a logical trap.
A) You have to buy the premise of its infallibility and self-consistency for the arguement to hold yet no one interpretation is universal and there are many questions about translation, context, etc. that dillute this application.
B) Applications out of context or with different interpretations leads to erroneous conclusions (It's not the Bible's fault if someone gets it wrong). In this forum I have seen scriptural arguements for and against reliance on tradition as a source of truth.
C) By treating the Bible as God's ONLY revealed truth, don't you negate all other sources of evidence God provided. Putting biblical truths above other more obvious and reasonable sources.
D) If you view the Bible as the place to turn for answers, are't you actually turning away from God? It is easier to read than to practice the more mystical side of religion (prayer, fasting, ritual feet washing).
E) Finally, isn't deification of the Bible simply another form of Idolatry? Are we treating scripture as a God?
Please don't mistake my tone as judgemental. I am impressed by the reasoning of many of those who are quoting scripture, but am having a hard time with the logic of scripture as evidence. In seveal cases I have seen contradicting arguements that are equally scriptually based.
One of my problems with turning to the Bible to explain or rationalize the challenges of existence is that it is a logical trap.
A) You have to buy the premise of its infallibility and self-consistency for the arguement to hold yet no one interpretation is universal and there are many questions about translation, context, etc. that dillute this application.
B) Applications out of context or with different interpretations leads to erroneous conclusions (It's not the Bible's fault if someone gets it wrong). In this forum I have seen scriptural arguements for and against reliance on tradition as a source of truth.
C) By treating the Bible as God's ONLY revealed truth, don't you negate all other sources of evidence God provided. Putting biblical truths above other more obvious and reasonable sources.
D) If you view the Bible as the place to turn for answers, are't you actually turning away from God? It is easier to read than to practice the more mystical side of religion (prayer, fasting, ritual feet washing).
E) Finally, isn't deification of the Bible simply another form of Idolatry? Are we treating scripture as a God?
Please don't mistake my tone as judgemental. I am impressed by the reasoning of many of those who are quoting scripture, but am having a hard time with the logic of scripture as evidence. In seveal cases I have seen contradicting arguements that are equally scriptually based.