Image of the day

Captured by
Michael Scherman

Lagoon and Triffid Celestron C6 Hyperstar4

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Joe Larkin

October 21, 2004 02:30 PM Forum: Telescope Making

Name this lens

Posted By Joe Larkin

Some kind of weird macro or reproduction lens, maybe. Check out this link:

http://www.macrolenses.de/ml_detail.php?ObjektiveNr=161


This was the most useful link from a search on google for Zeiss Planitar. There is one hit on google for a german forum where someone asks the same question you did, but there are no answers. Here is the machine translated link:

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://forum.astronomie.de/phpapps/ubbthreads/showflat.php%3FCat%3D%26Board%3Doptik%26Number%3D210382%26page%3D2%26view%3Dcollapsed%26sb%3D5%26o%3D%26fpart%3D1&prev=/search%3Fq%3DZeiss%2BPlanitar%2B%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26c2coff%3D1

October 29, 2004 02:22 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

Which bit 'o kit gave you the best eclipse view?

Posted By Joe Larkin

I observed with my Mark I eyeball, celestron 9.5x44 ED Binocs, and a f4.5 10" dob using a single 25mm plossl.

The Dob showed the most detail but binocs and naked eye showed different interesting views.

If I had to chose 2 out of 3 (ie. Naked eye plus one optic), it would really be a tossup between the binocs and scope. Overall, the scope wins because I "discovered" gamma aries when scoping around during the middle of the eclipse.

November 10, 2004 10:21 PM Forum: Deep Sky Observing

Leo 1 and other dwarf galaxies

Posted By Joe Larkin

Under good conditions (better than 6 mag skies, I'm sure transparency was good) I've seen Leo I in a 10" scope. I described it as v v faint, but I recall that it wasn't horribly difficult, but harder than Barnard's galaxy (6822 in Sagittarius). Knowing exactly where to look helps. I probably used a 22 panoptic for about 50x. I sketched the field stars to verify the faint glow.

November 11, 2004 02:27 PM Forum: Telescope Making

A big box on the porch

Posted By Joe Larkin

I think Mel Bartels' tri-dob with flex rocker seems like a great design for a low weight scope. I've never seen it in person, but it doesn't seem like it could get much lighter.

July 4, 2005 03:05 PM Forum: After Dark

Any Impact Visuals?

Posted By Joe Larkin

The comet pre-impact was very diffuse with an elusive but still visible nucleus in my 16" dob at medium to higher powers on Friday.

That's what it started out as last night. Post impact, the nucleus brightened considerably making the comet much easier even at very low altitude. The nucleus brightened over a few minutes after impact. I didn't estimate the change but someone I was with estimeted 1.5 magnitudes. The nucleus remained bright until I stopped watching when it got low.

I observed the comet under fair seeing, but dark and transparent skies at Vekol Road, an observing site 50 miles southwest of Phoenix Arizona.