Posts Made By: John Whitby

January 11, 2004 07:48 PM Forum: Religion

Paul O'Neill speaks

Posted By John Whitby

Another Dean-y Weanie comes out of the closet. Rob, that's the most idiotic supposition - Anyone who comes even close to believing that O'Neill-Dean crap probably believes the X-Files was a documentary.

Even Hillary and Bill don't repeat garbage like that.

February 26, 2004 01:18 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

Astomart-aholic - 10 Step Program ?

Posted By John Whitby

Been there- done that...

and it's a 12 step program!

March 5, 2004 10:34 AM Forum: Religion

Get your Mormon name here

Posted By John Whitby

The only Italian surname in Utah is Moroni!

March 13, 2004 12:11 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Somebody tell Al Nagler he mispronounces his name.

Posted By John Whitby

If he was true to the origin of the name he would probably prononce it like nogler, as is 'dog'. Mr. N. does say "Naygler" though. In deference to his Highness, the Wizard of Widefield, we should follow suit.

March 14, 2004 01:17 PM Forum: Politics

To Bu$h they're all same sex marriages!

Posted By John Whitby

Lousy speachwriter, again. Of course, other presidents have never made mistakes, right? Like when John Kennedy spoke in Berlin and told everyone he was a pastry?

Ich bin ein Berliner (a pastry) vs. Ich bin Berliner.

March 14, 2004 10:41 PM Forum: Religion

Re: Do you believe in a literal Adam and Eve?

Posted By John Whitby

Ron - excellent points. You are not narrowminded - quite the contrary in my opinion. One must be open minded to believe spiritual truths when they are at odds with the bits and pieces that are strung together to be fact.

So let's give Michael 15 pieces of a 1000 piece jigsaw puzzle and let him conclude, conclusively, what the picture is from the factual evidence. Then give him 100 more pieces. Then 100 more. Guess what happens?

When we know everything there is to know about religion AND science - they must be consistent. We just don't have all of the pieces of either today.

March 17, 2004 01:05 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

EP's for 9.25 Nexstar GPS? Advise needed.

Posted By John Whitby

No, no, no. Don't become an equipment or eyepiece junkie like the rest of us. You don't NEED to have a radian or Nagler or Panoptic or Pentax, yadayadayada de da.

You want to have a range of eyepieces that will provide you a range of magnification across the capabilities of your scope. At 50x per inch you don't need an EP that will give you more than 450 x or so. Two-inch EPS are low power, so no they don't do much for planetary observing. You won't be missing much by skipping the 2 inchers for right now.

You can buy a handfull of Plossls from Celestron or Meade or whomever, that will cover a good range of magnifications. You can buy fewer if you buy a barlow 2x doubler lens.

Please go to cloudynightsDOTcom and go to the beginners section. there is an article on eyepieces. Also, check out Al Nagler's advice on the TeleVue website. He gives good advice on spacing out the EP's. Eyepiece magnification = scope focal length / eyepiece focal length. True field of view is a more complicated formula, but there are many spreadsheets out there that calculate more than you would ever want to know about EP specs. There is one of TeleVue's site as well, for TV EP's.

If you find you have particular needs for eye relief, then you can start investing in Radians.

We've all been there. No question is stupid. You've invested in a great scope, but you don't need to throw $1000 at eyepieces right now.

March 28, 2004 09:46 PM Forum: Off Topic Discussions

Coast to Coast and Chernobyl

Posted By John Whitby

Today is the 25 year anniversary of 3 Mile Island - is it only a matter of time?

April 15, 2004 12:20 AM Forum: Equipment Talk

correct time site

Posted By John Whitby

I use my cell phone.

May 3, 2004 11:39 PM Forum: Pictures of Me and My Telescope and........

Scopes please Scopes

Posted By John Whitby

Cloudy/rainy night photo:
10" Discovery PDHQ
LXD55 AR5 on Celestron CG5-AS mount
Orion ED80 on Telepod/Bogen

John in CT