Image of the day

Captured by
RICHARD COFER

VdB 141 Ghost Nebula

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Posts Made By: Adam Albino

February 26, 2007 06:50 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

February 28, 2007 02:38 AM Forum: Beginning Astronomy?

Comparing MxImDL vs Star_Mx5 Image Capture

Posted By Adam Albino

the Star MX5 is a simple execution program - I would expect it to be much faster. As far as image quality - neither program should have a huge impact on the digital DATA, but certainly your settings in either program would. DL is a far more complex program, and is also far more customizable.

As an additional comparison, I thought Astroart's control program was much easier then either.

March 8, 2007 02:17 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Celestron timeline

Posted By Adam Albino

The older SCT's were NEVER made in Japan. Up until the new c-6 SCT They were ALWAYS made in USA - always in Calf.

The newer coatings are defiantely "better" then the original no coatings, then "Enhanced Coatings", then "Starbright" coatings. However, I believe the optical quality was a bit better in the 70's and early 80's scopes - at least from a consistantcy standpoint.

The years to worry about are from around 84 through 90 - known by some as the "Halley" years - where most scope manufactures switched to quantity over quality. With that said, of the 15+ 8" sct's I've owned the single best optically was an Ultima 8 PEC from around 90 - it was simply a breathtaking scope optically. I'm still kicking myself from ever selling it sad .

BTW - I highly recomend Robert Piekiel's e-book as a reference source for all 8"sct's....

http://www.astromart.com/classifieds/details.asp?classified_id=457615

March 20, 2007 11:07 PM Forum: Eyepieces

Don't shoot the messenger!

Posted By Adam Albino

I think your answer is here:

http://www.astromart.com/classifieds/details.asp?classified_id=490226

My Guess is it was a lot of hot air from one dealer over anothers new - but same as the old - product. This should be quite entertaining. I'd bet it's OK to mention the paries at this point....

March 23, 2007 11:52 AM Forum: Meade

Parts for cheap Meade scopes

Posted By Adam Albino

Contact Bill Vorce or Gary Russell - They both deal with new Meade "parts" from the factory. Of course you can also place an ad on A-Mart and see what comes up as used....

March 23, 2007 03:07 PM Forum: Celestron

My new C80 cannot be mounted to my new Vixen Icaru

Posted By Adam Albino

I assume the screws on the mount are just standard 1/4-20's (Photo size) - just buy a standard Vixen style mounting plate or probably cheaper have someone like Ken's Rings do it: http://www.kendauzat.net/other.htm

Of course, you could probably just tap the dovetail to take 1/4-20's, or replace the clamshell all together and buy two rings as alternatives.

March 24, 2007 12:49 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Uranometria2000

Posted By Adam Albino

When you want a very detailed all sky atlas. I just picked up my second copy of U2000. Between this, Trions SA2000, Becvar's, my copy of SAO, The Vehrenberg's, and throw in a few old classics like Nortons, Uptons, and Howards, among others, I got the sky covered smile

March 26, 2007 05:00 PM Forum: Equipment Talk

Astronomy Magazine VS. Sky and Telescope

Posted By Adam Albino

When I first started out I got both. Astronomy was easier to read, and was a bit "prettier" (better photo's) but over the years I found it lacking in detail - and it became obvious the the writing and editing just wasn't on the same level as S&T. I stopped getting Astronomy probably 10 years ago. Pick one up maybe a few times a year to page through - nothing I've seen has changed that perception.

It's been stated many times that Astronomy targets the Beginner to intermediate, while S&T targets the Intermediate to advanced. Probably why they both seem to survive.

March 28, 2007 12:59 PM Forum: Beginning Astronomy?

What is the lowest priced goto mount for reflector

Posted By Adam Albino

I'd have to agree with Roger. While you can convert the mount you have to GoTo, it's usually not a simple "bolt-on" conversion - it will take a bit of ATM work. Additionally the mount will need some items - such as a tangent arm for the dec shaft. You are talking arond 1500+ in most cases.

If you want to switch mounts, the cheapest is something like an EQ-6, but a tube of that size is probably max. I'd say go with the "push-to" set-up.

March 28, 2007 07:22 PM Forum: Deep Sky Observing

Full moon vs nebulas and star clusters

Posted By Adam Albino

....or Doubles, or Variables, or Saturn, or Jupiter, or Venus....