robert wikeen said:
Can someone explain the difference in views between a cooled down scope and one that isn't? Thanks!
Sometimes like atmospheric poor seeing.
In a solid tube newt one can defocus and see waves of turbulence sorta folding their way up the tube. Under other circumstances one can see (again defocussed) air chimneying out the top of the tube.
Optics of significant mass like primary mirrors and corrector plates can radiate heat for hours. This causes refractive air turbulence at the optical surfaces as well as tube currents. And reflectors of any flavor recieve their signal after two or more passed through this potential soup.
My largest scope is a 13" plate glass. Even after hours of cool down, long after the sonotube has shed it's thermal load and tube currents are undetectable, the mirror can still produce boundry layer thermals at the mirror surface. At this point they look a bit like the seeing is softening. Just a tad. Field stars at the limit of view will not sharpen. But when it is cooling issues, turning on the blower cleans up the image. Stars sharpen, tiny fuzzies don't. Planetary details sharpen also.
My first scope was a 4" newt. Not much thermal mass there. When I started using larger scopes I noticed how more seeing was an issue. Thought I was seeing much more of the atmospheric turbulence everybody was talking about. But a lot of it ultimatly turned out to be seeing conditions inside the scopes themselves.
If one looks down a solid tube newt, because of the heat sensitivity of our faces, heat coming up the tube can be easy to feel.