That article is so wrong on so many levels. And the pictures, too. But let's not let NC have all the "luck". The NAS is predicting a huge sea level rise in San Francisco, as mentioned in that article. Five feet by 2100. If you believe that, Rod, and anything else in that joke of an article, I'll sell you the Golden Gate bridge. Here is the S.F. hockeystick that's worse than the NC rise. So who can claim the biggest disaster? Look at the historic sea level rise in this picture, with their prediction tacked on to the end. If science had any more ethics, these guys would be demoted to scrubbing algae off tide buoys. And if journalism had an ethics, the LA Times writers would be demoted to writing ads for mattress warehouses.