Image of the day

Captured by
John Roach

Jupiter IO Transit 12-10-26

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

Good idea or not?

Started by tomrod, 08/06/2003 01:14PM
Posted 08/06/2003 01:14PM Opening Post
I would like to see corporate money taken out of politics. This might be done by stripping corporations of their "corporate personhood". They could then be prohibited from donating to political campaigns. Contributions could be limited to $10K per person or so and all political committees could be required to report their funding. This would level the playing field and come closer to the one man, one vote ideal.

What do you think?

P.S. This book looks interesting to me:

http://www.thomhartmann.com/unequalprotection.shtml

There are only 10 kinds of people who understand binary - those that do and those that don't
Posted 08/06/2003 09:25PM #1
Not really, I would be happy with the ethical integrity of the average lawyer turned politician. I think it would be MUCH better than the integrity of the average CEO or Board Member who buys a place at the head of the government line and leads us down his ethical path.

In my opinion there are few politicians that would dare pull some of the stunts that are regularly done by corporate leaders in the name of "God and Company".

There are only 10 kinds of people who understand binary - those that do and those that don't
Posted 08/07/2003 08:23PM #2
I understand where you are coming from but like it or not corporations are what built this country and they still drive the economy. If we eliminate the corporation influence then politics will be driven by people that think corporations are purely evil and that is not true. This country can't make it on mom and pop operations. We need corporations to be sucessful so that we can all be sucessful as a nation. Most of us are employed by corporations and losing all our manufacturing processes to other countries will leave as as a service oriented country. It's hard to support a nation this large by doing each other's laundry.

You're right we need some balance amd control of corporate responsibility but we need our corporations to be sucessful and profitable. Let's not throw out our future with the corporate bath water.

Daryl
Posted 08/07/2003 09:31PM #3
Couldn't this have unintended consequences? Namely, that if you cut out a lot of the contributions from outside sources, then the most well-funded campaign would end up being simply the wealthiest candidate, who can foot the most campaign funds personally?