Image of the day

Captured by
Gary Taylor

M27 - Dumbell Nebula

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

I wonder if Trump's sweat is orange...

Started by gmillerok, 08/22/2018 09:19PM
Posted 08/22/2018 09:19PM | Edited 08/22/2018 09:34PM Opening Post
As of yesterday, Donald Trump is the first president to essentially be an unindicted co-conspirator since Richard Nixon. 

Cohen's lawyer:

"Mr. Cohen has knowledge on certain subjects that should be of interest to the special counsel, and is more than happy to tell the special counsel all that he knows. Not just about the obvious possibility of a conspiracy to collude and corrupt the American democracy system in the 2016 election, which the Trump Tower meeting was all about. But also knowledge about the computer crime of hacking and whether or not Mr. Trump knew ahead of time about that crime and even cheered it on. We know he publicly cheered it on, but did he also have private information."

I think they just found one of the witches. The other one lives half the time at Mar-a-Lago.

If Trump was a democrat, impeachment proceedings would have already been commenced in the House. A co-conspirator conspiring with Cohen to violate Federal Campaign laws is an impeachable offense.

Attached Image:

gmillerok's attachment for post 158310
Posted 08/22/2018 11:03PM | Edited 08/22/2018 11:04PM #1
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/21/trump-cohen-manafort-impeachment-legal-791009

Former Bush DOJ spokesmen:

“It certainly gives the Democrats, should they win the House of Representatives, a serious piece of evidence to enter into articles of impeachment,” said Mark Corallo, a former Bush administration Justice Department spokesman who served as the spokesman for the president’s personal legal team before resigning over disputes on strategy. “When you can say that the president directed someone to break the law that’s a problem. That’s a big problem.”
Posted 08/22/2018 11:10PM #2
For the majority of Americans who voted that did not vote for Trump:

Attached Image:

gmillerok's attachment for post 158316
Posted 08/23/2018 01:54AM #3
Originally Posted by Richard Davis

First problem for your side is you can't say that.  Well of course you can say that, because we're used to leftists throwing around all sorts of unfounded assertions,  but you need to be able to back that up with evidence.  

Second, I've asked you before to only get back from you, sounds of crickets, but I'll try again for the 5th time.  

What law did the President direct Michael Cohen to break?  Be specific if you can, and if you do come up with a "quotation" have the courtesy and the professionalism to credit the source.  wink
52 U.S.C. 3011801) 35 30109(d)(1)(A), and 18 U.S.C. and 52 U.S.C. 30116(a)(1)(A),

30116(a)(7) 3r. 30109(d)(l)(A) and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2 b to be exact. As a co-conspirator, he is as guilty as Cohen of violation of these laws if he directed him to do so.
Posted 08/23/2018 02:32AM | Edited 08/23/2018 02:39AM #4
Not sure, but perhaps there was some error in pasting those links. The actual law Trump violated along with Cohen was 52 USC sections 30118(a) & 30109(d)(1)(A) and 18 USC Section 2(b) (count 7) and 52 USC Sections 30116(a)(1)(A), 30116(a)(7) and 30109(d)(1) (count 8). These are the counts that Cohen plead out to yesterday. I think DOJ and Cohen's lawyers know how these applied to him and they also applied to his un-indicted co-conspirator, your great orange headed leader.
Posted 08/23/2018 03:02AM | Edited 08/23/2018 03:04AM #5
It was cut from a pdf file that couldn't handle the section number translation. Rather appear to be one rather than actually be one, like yourself. Your turn.
Posted 08/23/2018 04:09AM #6
Did you have to go to work, or did your shift end at Fancy Bear?