See:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/fz10_pg5.html
Here's an interesting option for someone who might want to do some casual digital bird photography, with equipment under $600, in a camera weighing only about 20 oz.
With a IMAGE-STABILIZED 12X zoom that tops out an an equivalent FL of 420 mm, this edges into the range useful for bird photography, and even at that level offers f2.8. Of course, this has a SMALL sensor, 1/2.5, barely larger than that found in most pocket 3X cameras, but still that will do some work.
Otherwise the least expensive option would be a digital SLR, body alone $900 to $1500, image stabilized 80-400 or 100-400 zoom doubling that, for a total investment of $2500 to $3.000, and a LOT heavier.
As the lens reported has moderate barrel distortion at the wide angle end, likely the camera might not make a great overall camera, but at the 140-420 EFL where it would be used, it might well be all many folks want or need.
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2003_reviews/fz10_pg5.html
Here's an interesting option for someone who might want to do some casual digital bird photography, with equipment under $600, in a camera weighing only about 20 oz.
With a IMAGE-STABILIZED 12X zoom that tops out an an equivalent FL of 420 mm, this edges into the range useful for bird photography, and even at that level offers f2.8. Of course, this has a SMALL sensor, 1/2.5, barely larger than that found in most pocket 3X cameras, but still that will do some work.
Otherwise the least expensive option would be a digital SLR, body alone $900 to $1500, image stabilized 80-400 or 100-400 zoom doubling that, for a total investment of $2500 to $3.000, and a LOT heavier.
As the lens reported has moderate barrel distortion at the wide angle end, likely the camera might not make a great overall camera, but at the 140-420 EFL where it would be used, it might well be all many folks want or need.