Re: the debate over what constitutes an apo....
I don't have a lot of experience with refractors (various 60 mm's, Astroview 90, C-102, ST-80, TV-102), but a thought occurred to me--
Since astronomical objects are varyingly listed by their visual magnitude and their photographic magnitude, couldn't apos be listed this way as well? A visual apo would be a scope that corrected for false color to a satisfactory level visually, and a photographic apo would correct so well as to show no false color photgraphically.
Just a thought.
I don't have a lot of experience with refractors (various 60 mm's, Astroview 90, C-102, ST-80, TV-102), but a thought occurred to me--
Since astronomical objects are varyingly listed by their visual magnitude and their photographic magnitude, couldn't apos be listed this way as well? A visual apo would be a scope that corrected for false color to a satisfactory level visually, and a photographic apo would correct so well as to show no false color photgraphically.
Just a thought.