Image of the day

Captured by
John Roach

Jupiter IO Transit 12-10-26

My Account

New to Astromart?

Register an account...

Need Help?

MK67 Focus Question

Started by davel, 01/11/2003 09:36PM
Posted 01/11/2003 09:36PM Opening Post
I have heard that the MK67 with factory-supplied Crayford focuser cannot come to focus when using 1.25" eyepieces and adapters in a 2" diagonal. Thus, you would need both 2" and 1.25" diagonals to use both types of eyepieces. Have you found this to be the case? Would switching to a JMI focuser help? Is this even possible?

Thanks!
Dave
Posted 01/16/2003 05:50AM #1
Ad copy for Orion's Argonaut Maksutov-Cassegrain was as follows: <>

This copy always confused me. It implied that 1.25-inch eyepieces -- as you've noted/heard -- would not reach focus in a 2-inch diagonal. It also implies that 2-inch eyepieces, as well, would not reach focus, as the 2-inch diagonal/eyepiece combo would not allow enough inward focus.

However, a review of the Argonaut in "Sky & Telescope" (April '99 issue) noted that a 2-inch diagonal was actually *required* for 1.25-inch eyepieces. The S&T article -- *not* the Orion ad copy -- better fits my own experience with the Intes MK67 (Intes branded; not the Argonaut). Orion's recommendation for 1.25-inch eyepieces simply would not work in my MK67.

As per my understanding of the Intes MK67's focal plane position relative to the rear of the scope tube, I included a 50mm extension tube (2-inch diameter) with my MK67 order back in 2000. When coupled with a 1.25-inch diagonal, the extension allows all my 1.25-inch eyepieces to reach focus. *Without* the extension, a 2-inch diagonal is needed.

In other words: all Intes-branded MK67s of the past few years were/are designed with 2-inch diagonals in mind. As for Orion's old ad copy -- I'm just not sure how accurate it was. Perhaps early Argonauts were spec'd a little differently (focal plane further "forward," nearer the focuser) than latter versions.

Nutshell:
-If I were ordering a new Intes MK67 today, and I needed it to reach focus with a 1.25-inch diagonal, I would *expect* it to require an extension tube to do so.
-If I needed the MK67 to reach focus with a 2-inch diagonal, I would *expect* it to do, right out of the box.
-If I had any doubts or worries as to my expectations, I'd check with the dealer.

I hope this helps.
Best wishes.
-Dan
Posted 02/10/2003 11:07PM #2
Dave,

I have a newer MK-67 Deluxe (Delivered November, 2002), and use a 2" TeleVue Everbright diagonal. My eyepieces (Parks Super Gold 10mm, 15mm, 20mm, 35mm - the same as Orion Ultrascopics) all achieve focus with & without the TeleVue 2.5x Powermate. The focuser is almost all the way racked in with the 35mm, but it does focus.

Greg
Posted 03/11/2003 05:04PM #3
One more story. My MK67 was new in 2000, and I use a Lumicon 2" diagonal. My UO MK70 40mm, Widescan III 30mm, 24.5mm SWA, 19mm Panoptic, 13.8 SWA, 12.5mm & 9mm UO orthos, 11mm TV plossl, 9mm nagler T1, 7mm Nagler T1 all come to focus. There is not enough inward travel for my 6 & 7mm UO Orthos to reach focus.
Posted 03/13/2003 04:33PM #4
I have the Orion version, purchased about two years ago, and my 1.25 EPs will NOT come to focus in a 2" diagonal. Needs more in-focus.