Several times I have had people represent sale items (eyepieces and a barlow, specifically) as in excellent condition, yet when I got them they were not clean: eyelash oil, dirt, etc.
I used to be willing to clean them, but I am reluctant to do that now for fear of finding a scratch under all the grime, and then not being able to return the eyepiece "as received".
I think these are decent folks, they were willing to take them back, so I feel there was no intent to misrepresent, just very different standards.
To me an "excellent" condition eyepiece has to be clean.
(I'd much rather buy an uncleaned, unscratched EP than one poorly cleaned, I just want to know I'm going to have to do some work when I get it and have the price reflect that.
It can't be excellent and have any, no matter how small, scratches in the glass.
We have a standard form for EP evaluation, what do you all think of standards for the terms of EP condition at sale?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Dan
I used to be willing to clean them, but I am reluctant to do that now for fear of finding a scratch under all the grime, and then not being able to return the eyepiece "as received".
I think these are decent folks, they were willing to take them back, so I feel there was no intent to misrepresent, just very different standards.
To me an "excellent" condition eyepiece has to be clean.
(I'd much rather buy an uncleaned, unscratched EP than one poorly cleaned, I just want to know I'm going to have to do some work when I get it and have the price reflect that.
It can't be excellent and have any, no matter how small, scratches in the glass.
We have a standard form for EP evaluation, what do you all think of standards for the terms of EP condition at sale?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Dan