Hey y'all. I have a UO 25mm ortho that I use in a Meade 395 90mm. I like the views of M42 and star clusters, which is about all I know how to find, but when I use my bottom of the line Meade barlow on planets I get poor images. Saturn is pretty good at 2x but at 3x in front of the diagonal it gets kind of fuzzy. And Jupiter just won't get a good focus. I can see the 2 bands of clouds in the middle and can sometimes make out the polar caps, or what ever you call them. But it's quite blurry too. I would think my scope would hold better than 120x on Jupiter or Saturn. I was thinking of getting a better high power eyepiece or two and do away with the barlow but i was wondering if the UO 25 should hold up a lot better if I had a better quality barlow. I was reading another post where a guy was looking at barlows and I read a lot of recommendations. I was wondering if I should just invest in a barlow such as a TeleVue or similar quality and maybe 2 more eyepieces for a wider range. I just don't want to buy a higher powered eyepiece and be disappointed nor do I want to buy a better barlow and get the same results. My gosh I didn't realize I was rambling this much. Please advise. Thank in advance guy/gals.
Nate
Nate
Nate
http://www.exposuretime.com