The other post was getting a little long and hard to follow, so I am posting my follow-up in a new thread to make things easier to follow.
I would like to thank everyone for the large amount of advice so far. It appears that most people are recommending a 6 or 8 inch Newtonian on a Dobsonian mount. While I appreciate the light gathering advantage of these over most refractors, a requirement for consideration is that the scope must be able to pull double duty, for land viewing, as well as work on the stars (The wife will not allow funding for the project otherwise). A separate camera tripod will be used for land viewing. If I am correct in my readings, this limits me to a refractor with an erecting diagonal, or a similar equipped SCT?
I am looking for a telescope that will offer reasonable performance on planets, and well as the brighter DSOs. As I do not yet know which of these I will become more interested in, I want a scope that will let me sample a little of both, before choosing a second scope whose performance might be more specialized, in a few years.
Once again, thank you for all the information, and links to reviews.
Robert
I would like to thank everyone for the large amount of advice so far. It appears that most people are recommending a 6 or 8 inch Newtonian on a Dobsonian mount. While I appreciate the light gathering advantage of these over most refractors, a requirement for consideration is that the scope must be able to pull double duty, for land viewing, as well as work on the stars (The wife will not allow funding for the project otherwise). A separate camera tripod will be used for land viewing. If I am correct in my readings, this limits me to a refractor with an erecting diagonal, or a similar equipped SCT?
I am looking for a telescope that will offer reasonable performance on planets, and well as the brighter DSOs. As I do not yet know which of these I will become more interested in, I want a scope that will let me sample a little of both, before choosing a second scope whose performance might be more specialized, in a few years.
Once again, thank you for all the information, and links to reviews.
Robert